 |
Conclusion. References
|
|
|
|
CONCLUSION
To summarize, English grammar has been taught using the chalk and board system. It must be taught in such a way that learners would be able to communicate not only by speaking, writing, and listening, but also by engaging in a variety of engaging activities that emphasize form-meaning, mappings for everyday communication. That is the purpose of English grammar instruction, and it must be used for that purpose. As a result, innovative approaches aid in bringing about improvement, which is usually for the better. It aids learners in learning more quickly, efficiently, and in an engaging and interactive manner, and it is the teacher's duty to abandon conventional methods in favour of modern and improved methods for the good of the pupils. Using creative methods for teaching English grammar in the classroom can help pupils learn the language in a more meaningful way. Input enhancement may be more effective with grammatical features that are less important for communication (redundant, systemic, and less salient features such as past -ed); output enhancement may be more effective with grammatical features that are less essential for communication (redundant, systematic, and less salient features such as past –ed (e. g. past irregular); and grammar teaching can be more beneficial for EFL pupils.
The following findings were discovered during the research process:
There is no question that speaking is more important than ever in the age of globalization. Since English is a foreign language in our country and our educational system does not place a high priority on teaching speaking, it is recommended that grammar systems be used to teach speaking using suitable methods and techniques. We can see that speaking abilities are complex skills that must be consciously developed. They can be better established in the classroom through grammar exercises that encourage student engagement.
We can see that when the suggested materials are fun, original, and interesting, it is easier to get pupils' participation and encouragement. The goal is to inspire pupils and change their negative attitudes toward English by allowing them to talk about interesting topics. In this ever-changing teaching environment, it is desirable to state that teachers must assist pupils in their education and enable them to use English, while still maintaining constant communication with new techniques and resources. As a result of our study, we believe that 6th grade pupils already have kinesthetic abilities and like to walk around in the classroom. The methods we used to teach grammar constructs, such as communicative language learning and complete physical response, were effective in improving pupils' speaking and writing skills.
According to the results of the report, all schools should pay particular attention to ensuring that pupils are proficient in spoken English. The teaching and learning of spoken English would be more successful if teachers, pupils, and authorities work together and follow the recommendations.
|
|
|
On the other hand, the current study focuses on the needs of Kazakh learners in terms of writing skills, and it reveals that pupils are poor in writing and have little interest in this important learning tool. The teachers aren't properly trained. The issues that pupils face when it comes to writing are numerous. The study attempted to describe these issues and explore the essence of our country's current teaching method in greater depth.
To summarize, the efficacy of using named technologies in teaching English grammar to enhance speaking and writing skills has been shown, as discussed in my study of recent studies. Pupils improved their ability to communicate in English, write relevant subjects, coordinate their writing, and comprehend and embrace authentic content. Learners were able to distinguish between formal and informal writing and compose in both styles. The rapid growth of writing skills was aided by the use of new technology.
The results of this research, which were addressed in the previous chapter, should be carefully considered, and measures should be taken to use modern techniques which were investigated in this research work in our classrooms. If introduced, it is estimated that the state of writing and speaking skills through teaching and learning English grammar in our country will be significantly improved.
REFERENCES
1. Macfadyen, S. (2015). Different Methods of Teaching Grammar. Retrieved from https: //www. inklyo. com/.
2. Verner, S. (2019). How to Plan A Task Based Grammar Lesson. Retrieved from https: //busyteacher. org/
3. Alinte, C. (2013). Teaching Grammar with Music. Journal of Linguistic Intercultural Education. 6, 7-27.
4. Anburaj, G., Christopher G, and Ming, N. (2014). Innovative Methods of Teaching English. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 19 (8), pp. 62-65.
5. Mezenin S. M., Denisova L. G. Grammar in the course of intensive teaching of the English language in the upper grades of secondary school (in the concept of the content of intensive education) // Inostr. lang. in the school. 1992. No. 5-6. S. 5-12.
6. Larkina A. S. Features of the formation of grammatical speech skills of primary school pupils in the process of teaching English // Theory and practice of social development. 2013. No. 3. S. 105-107.
7. Ryazanova E. A. Formation of grammatical speech skills in order to teach a foreign language in a language university // Bulletin of the Tambov University. Series Humanities. 2012. No. 9. S. 153-156.
8. Shcherba L. V. Teaching languages at school. General questions of methodology: a textbook for pupils of the Faculty of Philology. 3rd ed., Rev. and add. SPb.: SPb
9. Galskova N. D. Modern methods of teaching foreign languages: a guide for teachers / ND Galskova. - M.: ARKTI, 2000. -- 165 p.
10. Solovova E. N. Methods of teaching foreign languages: a basic course of lectures: a guide for pupils of ped. universities and teachers / E. N. Solovova. - 3rd ed. - M.: Education, 2005. -- 238 p.
11. Passov E. I. Communicative method of teaching foreign language speaking / EI Passov. - M.: Education, 1991. -- 223 p. Ur P. Grammar practice activities: a practical guide for teachers / P. Ur. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. - 288 p.
|
|
|
12. Anil, B. (2017). Applying Innovative Teaching Methods in a Second Language Classroom. International Journal of Research in English Education.
13. Danarti, D. (2008). 50 Games for Fun. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andy.
14. Ellis, R. (2006). Current Issues in the Teaching of Grammar. TESOL Quarterly. 40 (1), 1-83, 96.
15. Fischer, J. (2012). Using Innovative Teaching Techniques and Technological Tools to Teach Grammar Points in Spanish and How They Increase Student Engagement. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education(IJCDSE), Special Issue, 2 (2), 1025-1030.
16. Jandhayala, D. (2018). Innovative Methods for Teaching English at Secondary Level. Retrieved from http: //galleryteachers. com
17. Kara, Z. E., and Aksel, A. S. (2013). The Effectiveness of Music in Grammar Teaching on the motivation and success of the learners at the preparatory school at Uludag University. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences. 106, 2739-2745.
18. Puasa, K. (2008). Teaching English through Pop Songs. Bandung: Yrama Widya.
19. Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). The nature of approaches and methods in language teaching. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Rini, A. (2008). Complete English Grammar in Short Stories. Bekasi: Kesain Blanc.
21. Scrivener, J. (2007). Learning teaching. 2nd edition. London: Macmillan.
22. Simpson, A. J. (2018). How to use songs in the English language classroom. Retrieved from https: //www. britishcouncil. org/
23. Ur, P. (1988). Grammar Practice Activities A Practice Guide for Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Vijayalakshmi, S. (2014). Innovative and Creative Means of Teaching Grammar. Paper presented at the National Conference on English for Employability (NCEE 2014) on 15thMarch, 2014 at Veltech Dr. RR and Dr SR Technical University. Innovative Techniques of Teaching English Grammar at Secondary Schools
25. Brown, H. D. (1994) Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language.
26. Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th ed. ). New York: Longman.
27. Brown, Nation. “Teaching Speaking: Suggestion for the Classroom. ” 4 January 2008 http: //jaltpublications. org/tlt/files/97/jan/speaking. html>
28. Chastain, K. (1998). Developing second language skills (2nd Ed. ). Chicago: Harcourt Brace Publishers.
29. Cohen & Manion. (1994). Research methods in education fourth edition. United States and Canada, Reprinted.
30. Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Person.
31. Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating
32. Quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
33. Davis, P. & Pearse, E. (2000). Success in English Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Foster E. and Rotoloni B. (2013) “Reciprocal Teaching”. The University of Georgia.
35. Harmer, Jeremy (2007) The Practice of English Language Teaching. 4th ed. London: Longman.
36. Harmer, Jeremy. The Practice of Language Teaching. 3rd ed. UK: Longman Publishers, 1991.
37. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (2nd ed. ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Rivers, Wilga Marie. Teaching Foreign Language Skills. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1968. Print.
39. Seraj, P. M. I. and Mamun M. A. A. “Speaking and Listening Practice in English Language Learning through Communicative Language Teaching at HSC Level”. Online journal of G-Science Implementation and Publication. Volume 2, Issue 4 (Nov. 2011): 07-12.
40. “Teaching Speaking: Goals and Techniques for Teaching Speaking. ” The National Capital Language Resource Center, Washington, DC.
41. Language Teaching, 2004. 14 December 2007 < http: //www. nclrc. org/essentials/speaking/goalsspeak. html
42. Wilson, Julie Anne (1997). A program to develop the listening and speaking skills of Children in a first grade classroom. Research Report, [ED415566]
|
|
|
