 |
The seven zones and their characteristics
|
|
|
|
XII
THE SEVEN ZONES AND THEIR CHARACTERISTICS
“To the first zone he gives the energy of Growth and Waning; unto the second zone, Device of Evils now de-energized; unto the third, the Guile of the Desires de-energized; unto the fourth, his Domineering Arrogance also de-energized; unto the fifth, unholy Daring and the Rashness of Audacity de-energized; unto the sixth, Striving for Wealth by evil means deprived of its aggrandisement; and to the seventh zone, Ensnaring Falsehood de-energized. ”—C. H., i. 25.
MACROBIUS ON “THE DESCENT OF THE SOUL FROM THE HEIGHT OF COSMOS TO THE DEPTHS OF EARTH”
Let us first turn to the commentary of Macrobius on the famous “Dream of Scipio, ” which Cicero introduces into his Republic (Bk. VI. ), just as Plato appends the Vision of Er to his. Macrobius devotes the twelfth chapter of his First Book to a consideration of “The Descent of the Soul from the Height of Cosmos to the Depths of Earth, ” and professes to base himself on Pythagorean and Platonic traditions. His dissertation covers more ground than the precise subject of the zones with which we are more immediately concerned; but as the whole scheme is of interest to our present
p. 414
studies, we will append a translation of practically the whole chapter.
“[According to Pythagoras] when the Soul descends from the Boundary where the Zodiac and Galaxy [or Milky Way] meet, from a spherical form, which is the only divine one, it is elongated into a conical one 1 by its downward tendency.
“Just as the line is born from the point and proceeds into length out of the indivisible, so the soul from its point, that is ‘monad, ’ comes into ‘dyad’—its first production [or lengthening].
“And this is the essence which Plato in the Timæ us, speaking about the construction of the World-Soul, describes as indivisible yet at the same time divisible.
“For just as the Soul of the World so also the soul of an individual man will be found in one respect incapable of division—if it is regarded from the standpoint of the simplicity of its divine nature—and in another capable [of division]—since the former is diffused through the members of the world, and the latter through those of a man.
“When then the soul is drawn towards body—in this first production of it—it begins to experience a material agitation, matter flowing into it. 2
“And this is remarked by Plato in the Phæ do [when he says] that the soul is drawn to body staggering with recent intoxication, —meaning us to understand by this a new draught of matter’s superfluity, by which it becomes defiled and gravid and so is brought down.
“A symbol of this mystic secret is that Starry Cup (Cratē r) of Father Bacchus placed in the space between
p. 415
[paragraph continues] Cancer and Leo 1—meaning that intoxication is there first experienced by souls in their descent by the influx of matter into them. From which cause also forgetfulness, the companion of intoxication, then begins secretly to creep into souls.
|
|
|
“For if souls brought down to body memory of the divine things of which they were conscious in heaven, there would be no difference of opinion among men concerning the divine state. But all, indeed, in their descent drink of forgetfulness—some more, some less.
“And for this cause on earth, though the truth is not clear to all, they nevertheless have all some opinion about it; for opinion arises when memory sinks. Those, however, are greater discoverers of truth who have drunk less of forgetfulness, because they remember more easily what they have known before in that state.
“Hence it is that what the Latins call a ‘lecture’ (lectio) the Greeks call a ‘re-knowing’ (repetita cognitio 2), because when we give utterance to true things, we re-cognize the things which we knew by nature before the influence of matter intoxicated our souls in their descent into body.
“Now it is this Matter (Hylē ) which, after being impressed by the [divine] ideas, fashioned every body in the cosmos which we see. Its highest and purest nature, by means of which the divinities are either sustained or consist, 3 is called Nectar, and is believed to be the drink of the gods; while its lower and more
p. 416
turbid nature is the drink of souls. The latter is what the Ancients called the River of Lethe [or Forgetfulness].
“The Orphic [initiates], however, suppose that Dionysus himself is to be understood as ‘Hylic Nous’ 1—[that Mind] which after its birth from the Indivisible [Mind] is itself divided into individual [minds].
“And it is for this reason that in their Mystery-tradition Dionysus is represented as being torn limb from limb by the fury of the Titans, and, after the pieces have been buried, as coming together again whole and one; for Nous—which, as we have said, is their term for Mind—by offering itself for division from its undivided state, and by returning to the undivided from the divided, both fulfils the duties of the cosmos and also performs the mysteries of its own nature.
“The soul, therefore, having by means of this first weight [of matter] fallen down from the Zodiac and Galaxy into the series of spheres that lie below them, in continuing its descent through them, is not only enwrapped in the envelope of a luminous body, 2 but also develops the separate motions which it is to exercise.
“In the sphere of Saturn [it develops] the powers of reasoning and theorizing 3—which [the Greeks] call τ ὸ λ ο γ ι σ τ ι κ ὸ ν and τ ὸ θ ε ω ρ η τ ι κ ό ν; in that of Jupiter, the power of putting into practice—which they call τ ὸ π ρ α κ τ ι κ ό ν; in that of Mars, the power of ardent vehemence—which they call τ ὸ θ υ μ ι κ ό ν; in that of the Sun, the nature of sensing and imagining—which they call τ ὸ α ἰ σ θ η τ ι κ ὸ ν and τ ὸ φ α ν τ α σ τ ι κ ό ν; in that of Venus, the motion of desire—which they call τ ὸ
|
|
|
p. 417
ἐ π ι θ υ μ η τ ι κ ό ν, in the sphere of Mercury, the power of giving expression to and interpretation of feelings—which they call τ ὸ ἑ ρ μ η ν ε υ τ ι κ ό ν; on its entrance into the sphere of the Moon it brings into activity τ ὸ φ υ τ ι κ ό ν —that is, the nature of making bodies grow and of moving them.
“And this [soul], though the last thing in the divine series, is nevertheless the first thing in us and in all terrestrial beings; just as this body [of ours], though the dregs of things divine, is still the first substance of the animal world.
“And this is the difference between terrene bodies and supernal—I mean those of the heaven and stars and of the other elements 1—that the latter are summoned upwards to the abode of the soul, and are worthy of immunity from death from the very nature of the space in which they are and their imitation of sublimity.
“The soul, however, is drawn down to these terrene bodies, and so it is thought to die when it is imprisoned in the region of things fallen and in the abode of death. Nor should it cause distress that we have so often spoken of death in connection with the soul, which we have declared to be superior to death. For the soul is not annihilated by [what is called] its death, but is [only] buried for a time; nor is the blessing of its perpetuity taken from it by its submersion for a time, since when it shall have made it worthy to be cleansed clean utterly of all contagion of its vice, it shall once more return from body to the light of Everlasting Life restored and whole. ” 2
The characteristics of the spheres given by Macrobius are according to their simple energies; there is no
p. 418
question of good or bad; it is the “thinking” of the soul that conditions the use of these energies for beneficent or maleficent ends.
|
|
|
