Morphemic Repetition. Extension of Morphemic Valency
The basic unit of this level being a morpheme we shall concentrate on examining the ways of foregrounding a morpheme so that the latter, apart from its inherent meaning, becomes vehicle of additional information-logical, emotive, expressive. One important way of promoting a morpheme is its repeti-tion. Both root and affixational morphemes can be emphasized through repetition. Especially vividly it is observed in the repetition of affixational morphemes which normally carry the main weight of the structural and not of the denotational significance. When repeated they come into the focus of attention and stress either their logical meaning (e.g. that of contrast, negation, absence of a quality as in such prefixes like a-, -anti-, mis-; or of smallness as in suffixes -ling and -ette); their emotive and evaluative meaning, as in suffixes forming degrees of comparison; or else they add to the rhythmical effect and text unity. The second, even more effective way of using a morpheme for the creation of additional information is extension of its normative valency which results in the formation of new words. They are not neologisms in the true sense for they are
created for special communicative situations only, and are not used beyond these occasions. This is why they are called occasional words and are characterized by freshness, originality, lucidity of their inner form and morphemic structure. Very often occasional words are the result of morphemic repetition. Cf.: "I am an undersecretary in an underbureau." The stress on the insignificance of the occupation of I. Shaw's heroine brings forth both - the repetition of the prefix under- and the appearance, due to it, of the occasional word 'Hinder-bureau". In case of repetition a morpheme gains much independence and bears major responsibility for the creation of additional information and stylistic effect. In case of occasional coinages an individual morpheme is only instrumental in bringing forth the impact of their combination, i. e. of new individual lexical unit. Assignments for Self-Control 1. What are the main cases of morphemic foregrounding? 2. What are the functions of morphemic repetition? 3. How are morphemes foregrounded in occasional words? 4. What is the difference between occasional words and EXERCISES I. State the function of the following cases of morphemic repetition: 1. She unchained, unbolted and unlocked the door. (A. B.) 2. It was there again, more clearly than before: the 3. We were sitting in the cheapest of all the cheap res- 4. Young Blight made a great show of fetching from his Mr. Aggs, Mr. Baggs, Mr. Caggs, Mr. Daggs, Mr. Faggs, Mr. Gaggs, Mr. Boffin, Yes, sir, quite right. You are a little before your time, sir." (D.)
5. Young Blight made another great show of changing the
Mr. Halley, Mr. Lalley, Mr. Malley. And Mr. Boffin." (D.) 6. New scum, of course, has risen to take the place of 7. At the time light rain or storm darked the fortress 8. Laughing, crying, cheering, chaffing, singing, David 9. In a sudden burst of slipping, climbing, jingling, clinking
10. The procession then re-formed; the chairmen resumed 11. The precious twins - untried, unnoticed, undirected - 12. We are overbrave and overfearful, overfriendly and 13. There was then a calling over of names, and great work 14. The Major and the two Sportsmen form a silent group 15. She was a lone spectator, but never a lonely one, be- 16. "Gentlemen, I put it to you that this band is a swin- 17. He wished she would not look at him in this new way. 18. Three million years ago something had passed this 19. "Sit down, you dancing, prancing, shambling, scram-
II. Analyze the morphemic structure and the purpose of creating the occasional words in the following examples: 1. The girls could not take off their panama hats because 2. David, in his new grown-upness, had already a sort of 3. That fact had all the unbelievableness of the sudden 4. Suddenly he felt a horror of her otherness. (J. B.) 5. Lucy wasn't Willie's luck. Or his unluck either. (R. W.) 6. She was waiting for something to happen or for everything
7. He didn't seem to think that that was very funny. 8. "You asked him." "I'm un-asking him," the Boss replied. (R. W.) 9. He looked pretty good for a fifty-four-year-old former 10. She was a young and unbeautiful woman. (I. Sh.) 11. The descriptions were of two unextraordinary boys: 12. The girl began to intuit what was required of her. 13. "Mr. Hamilton, you haven't any children, have you?" about that." (J. St.) 14. "To think that I should have lived to be good-morn- 15. There were ladies too, en cheveux, in caps and bonnets, 16. Parritt turns startledly. (O'N.) 17. The chairs are very close together - so close that the advisee almost touches knees with the adviser. (Jn. B.) III. Discuss the following cases of morphemic foregrounding: 1. The District Attorney's office was not only panelled, 2. He's no public offender, bless you, now! He's medalled
and ribboned, and starred, and crossed, and I don't know what all'd, like a born nobleman. (D.) 3. I gave myself the once-over in the bathroom mirror: 4. Well, a kept woman is somebody who is perfumed, and 5. It's the knowledge of the unendingness and of the rep- 6. The loneliness would suddenly overcome you like 7. I came here determined not be angry, or weepy, or 8. Militant feminists grumble that history is exactly what 9. This dree to-ing and fro-ing persisted throughout the night 10. "I love you mucher." "Plently mucher? Me tooer." (J. Br.) 11. "I'm going to build me the God-damnedest, biggest, 12. So: I'm not just talented. I'm geniused. (Sh. D.) 13. Chickens - the tiny balls of fluff passed on into semi- 14. I'll disown you, I'll disinherit you, I'll unget you. 15. "Ready?" said the old gentleman, inquiringly, when CHAPTER II. LEXICAL LEVEL Word and its Semantic Structure. Connotational Meanings of a Word. Th e Role of the Context in the Actualization of Meaning The idea of previous chapters was to illustrate potential possibilities of linguistic units more primitive than the word, found at lower levels of language structure and yet capable of conveying additional information when foregrounded in a specially organized context. The forthcoming chapter is going to be one of the longest and most important in this book, for it is devoted to a lin- guistic unit of major significance - the word, which names, qualifies and evaluates the micro- and macrocosm of the sur- rounding world. The most essential feature of a word is that it expresses the concept of a thing, process, phenomenon, na-ming (denoting) them. Concept is a logical category, its linguistic counterpart is meaning. Meaning, as our outstanding scholar L. Vygotsky put it, is the unity of generalization, communication and thinking. An entity of extreme complexity, the meaning of a word is liable to historical changes, of which you know from the course of lexicology and which are responsible for the formation of an expanded semantic structure of a word. This structure is constituted of various types of lexical meanings, the major one being denotational, which informs of the subject of communication; and also including connotational, which informs about the participants and conditions of communication.
The list and specification of connotational meanings varies with different linguistic schools and individual scholars and includes such entries as pragmatic (directed at the perlocutionary effect of utterance), associative (connected, through individual psychological or linguistic associations, with related and non-related notions), ideological, or conceptual (revealing political, social, ideological preferences of the user), evaluative (stating the value of the indicated notion), emotive (revealing the emotional layer of cognition and perception),* expressive (aiming at creating the image of the object in question), stylistic, (indicating "the register", or the situation of the communication). The above-mentioned meanings are classified as connotational not only because they supply additional (and not the logical / de-notational) information, but also because, for the most part, they are observed not all at once and not in all words either. Some of them are more important for the act of communication than the others. Very often they overlap. So, all words possessing an emotive meaning are also evaluative (e. g. "rascal", "ducky"), though this rule is not reversed, as we can find non-emotive, intellectual evaluation (e. g. "good", "bad"). Also, all emotive words (or practically all, for that matter) are also expressive, while there are hundreds of expressive words which cannot be treated as emotive (take, for example the so-called expressive * Cf. the famous quotation from V. I. Lenin: «Нельзя «изучать дейст-вительное положение вещей», не квалифицируя, не оценивая его». Ленин В. И. Полн. собр. соч., т. 23, с. 240).
verbs, which not only denote some action or process but also create their image, as in "to gulp" = to swallow in big lumps, in a hurry; or "to sprint" = to run fast). The number, importance and the overlapping character of connotational meanings incorporated into the semantic structure of a word, are brought forth by the context, i. e. a concrete speech act that identifies and actualizes each one. More than that: each context does not only specify the existing semantic (both denotational and connotational) possibilities of a word, but also is capable of adding new ones, or deviating rather considerably from what is registered in the dictionary. Because of that all contextual meanings of a word can never be exhausted or comprehensively enumerated. Compare the following cases of contextual use of the verb "to pop" in Stan Barstow's novel "Ask Me Tomorrow": 1. His face is red at first and then it goes white and his eyes stare 2. "Just pop into the scullery and get me something to stand 3. 'There is a fish and chip shop up on the main road. I thought 4. "I've no need to change or anything then."
5. "Actually Mrs. Swallow is out. But she won't be long. 6. "Would you like me to pop downstairs and make you a In semantic actualization of a word the context plays a dual role: on the one hand, it cuts off all meanings irrelevant for the given communicative situation. On the other, it foregrounds one of the meaningful options of a word, focusing the communicators' attention on one of the denotational or connonational components of its semantic structure. The significance of the context is comparatively small in the field of stylistic connotations, because the word is labelled stylistically before it enters some context, i.e. in the dictionary: recollect the well-known contractions - vulg., arch., sl., etc., which make an indispensable part of a dictionary entry. So there is sense to start the survey of connotational meanings with the stylistic differentiation of the vocabulary.
Воспользуйтесь поиском по сайту: ©2015 - 2024 megalektsii.ru Все авторские права принадлежат авторам лекционных материалов. Обратная связь с нами...
|