Главная | Обратная связь | Поможем написать вашу работу!
МегаЛекции

Word study. Comprehension. Follow-up




WORD STUDY

 

1. Match the words with the definitions.

 

  1. to tolerate                e. dosage                          i. supply
  2. to treat                     f. contaminate                  j. ban
  3. addict                      g. decriminalization         k. dependence
  4. liberalization           h. intoxicant

 

 

1. Liberalize- to make a system, laws, or moral attitudes less strict;

2. Decriminalize- to state officially that something is not illegal any more;

3. Supply- food, clothes, and things necessary for daily life or for a particular purpose, especially for a group of people over a period of time;

4. Addict- someone who is unable to stop taking drugs;

5. Dependence- when someone is addicted to drugs or alcohol;

6. To tolerate- to allow people to do, say, or believe something without criticizing or punishing them;

7. Ban- an official order that prevents something from being used or done;

8. Contaminate- to make a place or substance dirty or harmful by putting something such as chemicals or poison in it;

9. Dosage- the amount of a medicine or drug that you should take at one time, especially regularly;

10. Intoxicant- something that makes you drunk;

11. To treat- to behave towards someone or something in a particular way;

 

2. Make derivatives of the words.

 

Treat, addict, liberalize, tolerate, depend.

 

3. Insert the words.

 

1. Drinking water supplies are believed to have been------.

2. He was recommended a high ----of morphine.

3. Certain ----are culturally approved, and therefore acceptable.

4. Amy's ----him really badly - no wonder he's upset.

5. Both candidates promised to -----trade laws to allow for more imports.

6. He has openly said that he favours ------soft drugs.

7. Food ------in the camp were already running out.

8. Heroin -----run an increased risk of getting AIDS.

9. The clinic treats people affected by drug------.

10. Drug dealers will not be -----in this community.

11. The city has imposed a---- on smoking in all restaurants.

 

Ban, liberalize, dosage, treat, addicts, tolerate, decriminalizing, supplies, contaminate, intoxicants, dependence.

 

4. Insert the pre- and postpositions.

 

  1. Exactly the same thing happened … the years of Prohibition … alcohol in the US … the 1920s.
  2. Billions … dollars poured …. the war … drugs have not stopped the flow.
  3. This astonishing mark-up … a simple crop is largely the result … risks involved … transporting and distributing it.
  4. Chemicals used to try to stamp … illegal crops poison land and make people ill.

5. So, it is the poor and the young members … racial minorities who tend most often to get … trouble … the police.

6. With the exception … heroin drugs contribute … far fewer deaths among their users than either nicotine or alcohol.

7. Different countries should experiment … different solu­tions.

8. Similarly, it will take time … conventions governing sensible drug-taking to develop.

 

 

                                      COMPREHENSION

 

1. Answer the questions.

 

  1. Why are politicians so hesitant to urge the liberalisation of drugs laws?
  2. What does the decriminalization of cannabis mean?
  3. Why do some people consider drugs laws useless?
  4. What was the reason of the fall in prices on cocaine and heroin?
  5. What does the price on hard drugs consist of?
  6. What consequences the removal of drugs laws may lead to?
  7. What principles were stated in a famous essay “On Liberty”?
  8. Why ought addicted drug users be protected from themselves?
  9. Only a minority of drug users become dependent. Do you agree?
  10.  What is proposed for those who want to give up?
  11.  Do you agree that drug bans hurt poor countries?
  12.  Describe the drug trade in rich countries.
  13.  What advantages will police have if drugs ban is removed?
  14.  What other benefits of legalization were mentioned in the article?
  15.  What was said about deaths related solely to drugs?
  16.  Why drugs laws must be adopted gradually?
  17.  Do you approve of the approach adopted by the Swiss?
  18.  In what way should legalized drugs be distributed?
  19.  Why should different countries experiment with different solutions?
  20.  Name the main difficulties of drug legalization.

 

                                               FOLLOW-UP

 

Organize in your group the discussion on the topic “Legalization of drugs: pros and cons”.

 

 

                                  THE NETHERLANDS

 

In order to appreciate the Dutch approach to drug policy, certain characteristics of Dutch society must be kept in mind. The Netherlands is one of the most densely populated, urbanized countries in the world. It has a population of 15. 5 million, occupying an area of no more than 41, 526 km2. The Dutch firmly believe in the freedom of the individual, with the government playing no more than a background role in religious or moral issues. A cherished feature of Dutch society is the free and open discussion of such issues. A high value is attached to the well-being of society as a whole, as witness the extensive social security system and the fact that everyone has access to health care and education.

  During the 1970's a violent heroin market led the Dutch government to establish a drug policy working group which came to be known as the Baan Commission. Its recommendations largely determined the course of the Netherlands' drug policy. The core features of the Dutch system as established by the Baan Commission are rooted in the concept of harm reduction, i. e., the minimization of the risks and hazards of drug use rather than the suppression of all drugs. Dutch drug policy gives priority to health care and prevention while, simultaneously, directing aggressive enforcement measures against organized crime.

A wide range of harm reduction interventions are in use in the Netherlands. Methadone maintenance is available on demand. In 1998, a number of Dutch cities started experimenting with prescribing heroin, in combination with methadone, on medical grounds. Approximately 750 addicts are involved in the comparison of treatment with methadone and treatment with methadone and heroin, The experiment is still ongoing and a comprehensive evaluation has yet to be published.

To prevent HIV/AIDS and hepatitis B and C, syringe exchange programs were developed in the 1980s; today, 130 programs are operating in 60 Dutch cities and towns.

With respect to the supply side of the drug market, Dutch drug policy reflects the international repressive norm. On the demand side of the equation, however, a unique approach is evident. The Dutch policy recognizes that drug use may often just be a youthful indiscretion, but emphasizes compassion and treatment for those who develop drug use problems. Using this pragmatic approach, the government sets clear priorities based on the perceived risks of particular drugs. Public health is the overriding concern.

  Key elements of the Dutch drug policy include: the central aim is the prevention or alleviation of social and individual risks caused by drug use; there must be a rational relation between those risks and policy measures; a differentiation of policy measures must also take into account the risks of legal recreational and medical drugs; repressive measures against drug trafficking (other than trafficking of cannabis) are a priority; and the inadequacy of criminal law with respect to other aspects (i. e., apart from trafficking) of the drug problem is recognized.

    A key aspect of Dutch drug policy is the notion of market separation. By classifying drugs according to the risks posed and then pursuing policies that serve to isolate each market, it is felt that users of soft drugs are less likely to come into contact with users of hard drugs. Thus, the theory goes, users of soft drugs are less likely to try hard drugs. Possession of small amounts of cannabis for personal use has been decriminalized in the Netherlands. The sale of cannabis is technically an offence under the Opium Act, but prosecutorial guidelines provide that proceedings will only be instituted in certain situations. An operator or owner of a coffee shop (which is not permitted to sell alcohol) will avoid prosecution if he/she meets the following criteria: no more than 5 grams per person may be sold in any one transaction; no hard drugs may be sold; drugs may not be advertised; the coffee shop must not cause any nuisance; no drugs can be sold to minors (under age 18), nor may minors enter the premises; and the municipality has not ordered the establishment closed.

  Separating the markets by allowing people to purchase soft drugs in a setting where they are not exposed to the criminal subculture surrounding hard drugs is intended to create a social barrier that prevents people experimenting with drugs like heroin, cocaine and methamphetamine, drugs deemed an " unacceptable risk. " Decriminalization of the possession of soft drugs for personal use and the toleration of sales in controlled circumstances has not resulted in a worryingly high level of consumption among young people. The extent and nature of the use of soft drugs does not differ from the pattern in other Western countries. As for hard drugs, the number of addicts in the Netherlands is low compared with the rest of Europe and considerably lower than that in France, the United Kingdom, Italy, Spain and Switzerland. Dutch rates of drug use are lower than U. S. rates in every category. [34]

                                                                    

 

Поделиться:





Воспользуйтесь поиском по сайту:



©2015 - 2024 megalektsii.ru Все авторские права принадлежат авторам лекционных материалов. Обратная связь с нами...