The Law of God (Torah) prevents the Samaritan believer from completely accepting the claims of both Jesus and Muhammad (peace be upon them)

The Law of God (Torah) prevents the Samaritan believer from completely accepting the claims of both Jesus and Muhammad (peace be upon them)

According to the holy Gospel, Jesus of Nazareth (peace be upon him) had no human father [and therefore was technically an orphan].
In addition, the Nazarene never married, nor did he ever procreate any children. Thus, it is impossible to safely rule out the possibility that Jesus testicles were crushed; or that Jesus penis was missing [or cutout].
But, in spite of this uncertainty, the Gospel narrative presents Jesus as claiming to be the Jewish High priest who would offer himself as the ultimate sacrifice to atone for Israel sins.
And why would this be important? It is important because the Torah (the Law of Moses) expects the Jewish religious leadership (particularly the High Priest) to be above any suspicion, or any reproach. In other words, since people with moral, physical, and intellectual limitations will often display a high degree of low self esteem, they are easily tempted to make false [and trumped up] claims, in order to justify receiving the glory and honor they think their current limitations deny them.
And that's why the Torah tells us that God didn't allow anyone with physical blemishes to take part of the priestly sacrifices [let alone become the High Priest]. As it is written- «The Lord spoke to Moses: “Tell Aaron: None of your descendants throughout your generations who has a physical defect is to come near to present the food of his God.
NO MAN WHO HAS ANY DEFECT IS TO COME NEAR: NO MAN WHO IS BLIND, LAME, FACIALLY DISFIGURED, OR DEFORMED; NO MAN WHO HAS A BROKEN FOOT OR HAND, OR WHO IS A HUNCHBACK OR A DWARF, OR WHO HAS AN EYE DEFECT, A FESTERING RASH, SCABS, OR A CRUSHED TESTICLE. No descendant of the priest Aaron who has a defect is to come near to present the fire offerings to the Lord. HE HAS A DEFECT AND IS NOT TO COME NEAR... ”»- Leviticus 21: 16-21.
Not only does the Torah asks us to avoid the questionable situation were a physically disabled person attempts to get an exalted position [in order to satisfy his selfish ego]- but it even commands us to avoid letting into the circle anyone whose motives might be uncertain [or questionable].
As it is written: “He [the High Priest] is to marry a woman who is a virgin. He is not to marry a widow, a divorced woman, or one defiled by prostitution. He is to marry a virgin from his own people, so that he does not corrupt his bloodline among his people”- Leviticus 21: 13-15.
Why can't the High Priest marry a widow? Because people might think that the High Priest had glanced at her favorably, thus inducing her to poison her current husband, in order to be available to the High Priest.
And why couldn't the High Priest marry a divorced woman? Because people might think that she was already pregnant when she married him [and therefore the heir to the High Priest post would end up being a bastard].
And the same rule applies to the post of supreme leader [or “king”] of Israel- No illiterate man could be accepted as king of Israel, as the Torah demanded that the king should be able to write his own Torah scroll: “And it shall be, when he [the Hebrew King] sitteth upon the throne of his kingdom, that he shall write him a copy of this Law in a book from that which is before the priests the Levites”- Deut. 17: 18 (King James 21st Century Version).
In summary, the Torah sets a high moral standard for the post of High priest; and since Jesus (peace be upon him) was an orphan [whose father identity remained uncertain], and since he never proved beyond any doubt that his testicles weren't crushed, therefore the Hebrew people cannot accept him as their High Priest.
By the same token, since prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) was an orphan who never learned to read or write, the Hebrew people are prevented from accepting him as their “king” (in other words, as their supreme spiritual leader).
Still, since most Christians [and Muslims] do not have a profound knowledge of Torah, they incur in no fault when they consider Jesus (p. b. u. h. ) to be the Messianic High Priest, or consider Muhammad (p. b. u. h. ) to be the final and greatest of all spiritual leaders.

«Ante los ojos del Creador (el Dios de Abraham, bendito sea), no hay Samaritanos, Judí os, Cristianos, ni Musulmanes; solo hay gente comprometida con hacer el Bien ordenado en las dos tablas de Piedra (no robes, no mientas, no asesines, no adulteres, honra a tus padres, etc), y gente que aú n no se ha comprometido con hacer ese Bien. Como esta escrito: “La conclusió n de todo el discurso oí do [acerca de la vida y de la fe] es é sta: TEME A DIOS, Y GUARDA SUS MANDAMIENTOS; PORQUE ESTO ES EL TODO DEL HOMBRE. PORQUE DIOS TRAERÁ TODA OBRA A JUICIO, juntamente con toda cosa encubierta; SEA BUENA O SEA MALA”- Eclesiasté s 12: 13-14, Biblia Reina Valera, Revisió n de 1977; “El Señ or ya te ha dicho, oh hombre, en qué consiste lo bueno, y qué es lo que É l espera de ti: que hagas justicia, que seas fiel y leal, y que obedezcas humildemente a tu Dios”- Miqueas 6: 8, Biblia “Dios Habla Hoy”; Y tambié n dice en otro lugar: “Bendeciré a los que tienen un corazó n humilde y arrepentido [sin importar si son Judí os, Cristianos, o Musulmanes], a los que tiemblan ante mi palabra”- Isaí as 66: 2, Biblia “Nueva Traducció n Viviente”»

Si la Ley de Dios es correcta, entonces toda porció n del Evangelio que la contradiga, deber ser errada

Un estudio detallado de la Sagrada Escritura muestra que, " el Brit Ha-dasha" (el Santo Evangelio) no posee el mismo grado de inspiració n Divina que posee la Ley de Dios (la " Torah" ). Es que la Ley de Dios dice así: “Cuidará s de hacer todo lo que yo te mando; no añ adirá s a ello, ni de ello quitará s” (Deut. 12: 32).
Y lo anterior significa que, la veracidad del Antiguo Testamento (la Ley), no dependí a en lo absoluto de nada de lo que pudiese añ adir [o quitar] algú n futuro libro (como serí a el caso con el “Nuevo Testamento”); y significa tambié n que, la veracidad de la Ley de Moisé s, no dependí a para nada de la veracidad de una futura “Ley de Cristo”.
En cambio, la veracidad del N. T. (el Evangelio), depende absolutamente de la veracidad del A. T. (la Ley); ¿ Por que? Pues porque, no es la Ley, la que alega ser el cumplimiento del Evangelio; sino que, es el Evangelio, el que alega ser el cumplimiento de la Ley (" No pensé is que he venido para abrogar la Ley o los Profetas; no he venido para abrogar, sino para cumplir" - Mateo 5: 17).
Así las cosas, siempre que el Evangelio diga algo que contradiga [o difiera de] la Ley, la ló gica nos fuerza a asumir que, es el Evangelio [y no la Ley], quien esta equivocado. ¿ Por que? Pues porque, si el Evangelio “no cumple” lo dicho y ordenado en la Ley, entonces serí a ridí culo reclamar que el Evangelio es “el cumplimiento” de la Ley.
Por ejemplo, si la Ley dice que “Dios no es hombre, ni Hijo de hombre” (“DIOS NO ES HOMBRE, para que mienta, NI HIJO DE HOMBRE para que se arrepienta”- Nú meros 23: 19), y en adició n dice que nadie puede morir por el pecado ajeno (“Los padres no morirá n por los hijos, ni los hijos por los padres; CADA UNO MORIRÁ POR SU [PROPIO] PECADO”- Deut. 24: 16); pero luego viene el Evangelio, y no solamente reclama que Dios es en efecto el hijo de hombre llamado Jesú s (“Aguardando la esperanza bienaventurada, y la manifestació n gloriosa de NUESTRO GRAN DIOS Y SALVADOR JESUCRISTO”- Tito 2: 13), sino que tambien alega que Jesú s murió por el pecado ajeno (“Porque primeramente os he enseñ ado lo que asimismo recibí: Que CRISTO MURIÓ POR NUESTROS PECADOS... ”- 1 Corintios 15: 3), entonces no nos queda otro remedio sino asumir que, la Ley dice la Verdad, mientras que el Evangelio no la dice.
¿ Por que no dice la verdad el Evangelio? Pues porque, su reclamo, “no cumple” lo dicho por la Ley (que es el alegato sobre el cual se fundamenta la alegada veracidad del Evangelio)