 |
Будущее мирового сионизма, 3 глава
|
|
|
|
birth of a young irregular (cause it is young) galaxy. Then coils
again start to uncondense, the process of active star formation
another galaxy is a pair of maternal and daughter galaxies on the
stage of separation, and what is normally considered satellites
are separated daughter-galaxies. Therefore we can for certain
affirm that our Galaxy having given birth to Great and Small
Magellan Clouds, pulsated twice; now, judging by the movement of
the Sun in relation to baldge, is on the stage of uncondencing of
c fact that in symmetry with Magellan Clouds but on the other
side of Galaxy two tiny elliptical galaxies are drifting in
Cosmos, there is a temptation to suppose that in one direction
spiral galaxy is born and in other Ч elliptical one, "but only
one-side jets are seen in quasars independently of intensity
correlation of the central source and distant component". But it
can't be that Galaxy could pulsate four times producing in differe
Pp. 25-28
Running a few steps forward I can say that good results will give
combination of astrophysics' Ч geophysics' when it will appear as
a single entity. But still undisputable facts need to be
liberated from hypotheses and fantasies. The Sun pulsates
changing brightness and radiating, besides others, all elements
of Mendeleev's table independent of transformation into
fast-rotating neitron star. The condition of its pulsation is not
also rotati with additional accretion of star matter. We don't
need examples from distant Cosmos. Nuclei of uranium are flying
in the flow of sun lights fully independent of explosion of
Supernew, they fly from the surface of the luminary being, as
nuclei other 91 elements, a product of reactions inside the star.
Let us introduce and consider one more undisputable fact to which
ALL astrophysicists didn't pay any attention, precisely as before
quantum electrodynamics emerged there were no those eager
Particles, from the most heavy and slow infrared ones (there is
still no other name for them) to the most light and fast
ultraviolet ones, flies from stars, accumulatons of stars, nuclei
of galaxie interaction with these "rays". But the surface of
planets is not the only obstacle for all the spectrum of these
small space wanderers. On their way, they also meet stars, star
associations and nuclei of galaxies! But while light, falling on
th surface of glass, reflects from relatively motionless
electrons (as theory describes it), falling onto the surface of a
star, IT COLLIDES WITH PARTICLES FLYNG AGAINST IT AT THE SAME
SPEED! The probability of collision in inter-star space is equal
zero, but it increasingly hightens at the surface of a star. And
then Ч E = mc2, and the process of synthesis. Then decay, again
synthesis and: synthesis Ч decay, synthesis Ч decay. Pulsation.
Rotation in the visible world here is completed. I suppose that
the fact of collision of particles (photons, quanta, gravitons,
|
|
|
quarks) of light with a star is not to be disputed. The fact that
at the surface of a star collision of flying in and flying ou
unquestionable. The fact that collision of two bodies produces
energy is known even to a schoolboy. The only question is: what
is the nature of this energy? And all other things are the same
th so on. Thus, there is also similarity in that "Quantum
electrodynamics "resolves" the question of corpuscular-wave
duality of light, stating that light consists of particles (as
Newton put in physics was the retreat of physics to the position
where only calculation of PROBABILITY of photon getting into
detector is recognized possible, and no one proposes valuable
model of HOW it really happens". Some idea about this process
gives Y.I. Vitinsky describing solar flashes. But phenomenon of
flashes is so complex and their variety is so vast (proton,
electron, of different intensity and different proceeding times)
that imagine a clear picture. But it's only so far. It's worth
mentioning that "electron flashes (in the course of which only
electrons are emitted) are observed more frequently than proton
ones normally accompanied by splashes of the III kind and
misrowave radiation, and also by splashes of hard X-rays. It is
interesting to mention that during the last years from some
proton flashes gamma-radiation was registered which is a sign of
the nucl Anyway, probabilistic description of the event preceding
the beginning of thermonuclear-nuclear interaction here is more
understandable and imaginable than "singularity" of the Big Bang.
Concerning the scheme of the process the result of which is
synthesis-decay-synthesis... here it is, on the supplementary
colour sheet.
Astrophysicists! Open the rare panel of mechanical clock, look at
the pendulum spring! Imagine on its place the spiral scheme of
chemical elements. And you will see how sters "work".
Forseeing some questions I'll answer the main one: there is no
law that manifests itself in pure form. The eight groupe was to
be removed from the table, because, according to Mendeleev, it
has nothing to do with periodicity. It was also necessary to take
into account that pulsation takes place with an appropriate
falling out of step (big and small splashes schematically
alternate) resulting in synthesis of all elements of this group.
The an registrator could be created it would fix, at the normal
speed of review, manifestation of similar picture in all stars.
But speeds of processes in different stars are different and so
vast that (this is an answer to the third question) only the
beginning and the end of the process are seen, i.e., hydrogen
with helium and hydrogen with helium. All remaining Ч expences
but however witout them this scheme couldn't be created. The law
of conservation of substance weight formulated by M.V. Lomonosov
is relevant in Cosmos. But, as it seems, keenness on cosmology
somehow excludes LIGHT in the form of particles from the gener
could it be taken into account if LIGHT not long ago had no
weight, didn't fill inter-star and inter-galaxy space, it was a
WAVE, it had LENGTH and independently of unrelated conditions
spread Energy exchange (for masses with speeds) between
structural units of Cosmos permits to understand if not
|
|
|
mechanism, but rather causes of galaxy mass growth, critical
limit of which leads to compressing, throwing out of surplus in
the form of young galaxies; reverse prosses of forming of star
associations and stars.
Pp. 33-36
Craters cover the surface of Mercury, Venus, Earth (Pre-Cambrian
shields). Specific characteristic is the time of crater emergence
Ч they are actually are of the same age on any heavenly body.
There are slight differences (in interplanetary scale) compared
with that on what particular planet (satellite) craters are
present. Where did such amount of meteorites come from? Why are
they so regular and round? Why did they appear at one time? And
how did they chance to arrive in all places at once, if not at
once then why everywhere? What was said in this connection? G.
Silk. "Great Explosion": "The research of craters on the Moon,
Mercury and Mars pointed out that within some hundreds of million
years (about 4,6 billion years ago) the rate of crater emergenc
higher than today. There occured collisions with planetesimals
diameter of which (about 100 km) is typical for many asteroids".
John Darius. "Inaccessible for an Eye": "Abundance of craters (
meteorite bombardment but it is not true. The intensity of
Ganimed "firing" was two times higher, and in Europe and Io much
higher. Their surface however renovated within less than 4000
mln. a powerful flow of meteorites) while Callisto keeps all its
scarms... Therefore it would be more correct to compare
concentric ring on Callisto with percussion structures on other
bodies o However on closer examination external similarity
vanishes. On planets with rocky soil only two or three irregular
rings are seen (Eastern Sea on the Moon could be a good example);
but in the places with more numbers of rings, with growth of ring
radii distance between them is increasing". I.e., some
selectivity of direct hit is observed, which concerns not only
points on the surface but also crater diameters (meteorites).
There are some facts that don't correspond with "meteorite"
theory. "Craters discovered on Io by devices of "Voyager",
emerged not upon the influence of meteorites but in the result of
volcanic caldero-like deepenings... Other calders have
light-coloured edges with various shades; on some of them traces
of volcanic eruptions are not seen". "Crater Yuti, the first of
craters of such kind, essentially differs from percussion craters
discovered on other closest to the Sun bodies of the Solar
system, namely on Mars and Moon. There, typical big crater has a
c ring-shaped swell in the form of terraces; straiifications of
thrown out substance and secondary craters are spotted around;
sometimes long radial "rays" disperse from the centre of a crat
terraces, and the smallest craters have not flat but a cup-shaped
bottom. Similar traits are characteristic for many marsian
craters with the exclusion that surrounding them stratifications
a fragments is absent; instead of it, from a crater Ч at the
distance about one diameter from the edge Ч as if tongues of
substance are pouring out. Because of "embankments" outlinging
borde ones.Craters of such type for the first time were described
by G. McColey on the base of photos received from "Mariner-9" but
he however considered petal-shaped deposits as the result of wind
erosion. Before the flight of "Vikings" such craters were not
studied and their essential prevalence on the surface of Mars
remained unnoticed. Take a look at covering each other deposit
layers around Yuti crater: tongues don't run on each other like
flow formations "spilled craters". Partly filled up crater on the
left of Yuti gives a key to the solution of flow character. This
small and older crater is seen rather distinctly that supposes
that pouring out substance, whether it more or less dense, was
|
|
|
pouring in a thin layer Ч it's more characteristic for dirt flows
rather than volcanic eruption... Pouring out of a crater flow
could slide across the "pillow" of atmospheric gases but more pr
evaporating under avalanche the layer of surface ice. Steep
peripheral swell could be shaped in the course of water freezing
under cooling down flow. Such excrescences can be observed on Ear
thrown out substance are characteristic for marsian craters 15
and more km in diameter..." The idea that origin of craters is
inner, to be more precise inner-planetary, matter related with a
spill, out-burst of primary substance, is assured by another,
this time earthly fact. Jonn Darius in the same book says about s
of ancient meteorite craters called astroblemas. The described
example concerns the Araguayan cupola which "consists of
deformated Devonian sandstone aged 350-400 mln. Years, and in the
cen condensed erupted rock...Though astroblemas are considered to
be produced by powerful explosions, relation between astroblemas
and fall of meteorites onto Earth remains mainly disputable. All
the signs of a powerful blast are apparent: cones of crushing,
condensed silicates, blust-melted zones, deformated crystals but
no traces of meteorites themselves. (They are not found on any
planet.) Specific trait of astroblems are cones of crushing Ч co
incline of which is growing on moving off the centre. Today about
100 astroblems are known (and 100 more are supposed) and in 30 of
them similar fragments were discovered. It is assumed that burnt
with an explosion in atmosphere which have no time to reach the
surface of the Earth. Anyway it's hard to reconcile with the fact
that "crime" was committed and criminal was not yet discover It's
easy to identify a criminal. Protoplanetary both of post-star
substance was thickening and, "being boild to readiness",
gurgling. I can invite any of doubting persons to the kitchen
stove a last stage of cooking. When it begins gurgling you can
see lunar craters on the stage of creation. The same picture can
be observed in craters of inertly acting volcanos: there, also
slowly lava is gurgling, imitating the process that was proceedi
long long ago.
Pp. 45-50
What kind of cosmic factor leads both to pulsations of Earth and
to reorientations of surface points relatively to the axis of
rotation? There is nothing constant in the world, and distance
between Earth and Sun time to time is only relatively constant.
Look at the calendar: once in four years a leap-year occurs Ч the
only but enough convincing evidence of the fact that the lengt
earthly orbit increases with every turn around the Sun. At some
particular moment, as it happened 10000 years ago, centrifugal
forces tears off gravitational attraction and Earth (and Moon alo
distant relatively constant orbit. The result is inevitable
decrease of density and natural growth of volume with the same
mass. On decaying of the process condensing happens. But both
proc repeat citation: "Bohr deserts classical physics postulating
that atom electrons can exist only only in particular states...
Then, again not taking into account the laws of classical physi
orbit, it doesn't radiate light. According to his theory, atom
emits light only if electron LEAPS from stationary state with
higher energy to the state with lower energy". Laws of the
Universe are common.Classical mechanics was considering special
relatively-temporary case. What concerns light emittance, within
the time of lavas pouring out (12 mln years in every period!) it
|
|
|
co especially at night. Of course, radial-orbital changes apply
to all planets. And what side of Earth will turn to the Sun...?
Here probably V.N. Sholpo is right who was the first to pay
attention to the rational distribution of masses on the planet's
su Freely-chaotic pouring of lavas and also emergence of folds
and flexures in various places of earthly surface was leading to
excenricity in Earth's rotation around its axis. It had to
provide reverse influence on the motion around the Sun (pulsating
inevitably leads to rebounding) but having transited to a new
orbit the Earth inevitably would occupy the most optimal state
from the point of view of uniformity of rotation. The same way i
and uniform mass distribution across the surface. Principle of
gyroscope. A brief look at axis inclines of some planets of the
Solar system: Jupiter Ч 3 degrees, Uranium Ч 98 degrees, Moon
(satellite) Ч 0 degrees Ч allow us to recognize as disputable
concept about costancy of earth's axis orientation in outer space
a by contrast, to state that in different geological epochs axis
orientation could be different, not only perpendicular to the
surface of ecliptics, and if so, not only necessarily twice a
year, 21 of March and 21 of September. In more details, applied
to the Quarterly period, it will be considered in the next
chapter, and now let us look for some conformities. In 1888
Vernadsky wrote to his wife: "Minerals are remains of those
chemical reactions that proceeded in various points of the globe;
these reactions proceed in accordance with known to us laws but
which general changes which our Earth is subject to as a star.
The aim is to relate these different phases of Earth with general
laws of heavenly mechanics. It seems to me that here something
more is hidden if we take into account the complexity of chemical
elements... Then genesis of elements is related with the
development of solar or star systems, and the "laws" of chemistry
get quite different tint..."
V.I. Vernadsky wrote not only about it. To Lev Gumilev, Ivan
Efremov, Vitaly Larichev, to all others whose ideas have formed
the basis for real works, his words can be applied: "All the
history of science on every step shows that single personalities
were more right in their arguments than the whole corporations of
scientists or hundreds and thousands of researchers, adhering to
dominating views".
Hundred years later, in 1982, G.V. Voytkevitch using data on the
studies of meteorites, masses and planet spectres in more detail
set forth the subject of chemical evolution of protoplanetary
substance: "Emergence of Earth and planets of Solar system was
not only explained by the laws of mechanics on which recently
relied classical cosmogonic hypotheses, but also was connected
with qualities of substance itself Ч with physico-chemical
processe cosmic history was determined by the laws of nuclear
physics and thermodynamics. Forming of chemical elements
consisting from atoms was conditioned by the structure of their
electronic cover and physical conditions in the limits of
relatively low temperatures compared with conditions of nuclear
synthesis... As was already mentioned, startling similarity of
isotope composition of various bodies of the Solar systems,
witnesses that substance of the Sun and substance of the Earth
befor particular stage were developing in the same way. This
crucial stage manifested itself in division of common system...
into primary Sun and circumsolar substance originally having
solar gas structure. We don't know particular mechanism of
separation of this substance. It was probably related with
centrifugal forces, emerged from the change of rotation speed of
primary massive star. Thus was formed protoplanetary solar nebula
in the form of gas disc coinciding with the plane of solar equato
Emergence of this disc was inevitably related with broadening of
SOLAR(STAR) substance and its cooling down the temperatures
promoting birth of molecules, chemical compounds and metallic ph
Explaining the process of secession of sedimentary rocks,
adducing extremely valuable data about chemical structure of
upper covers of Earth, Voytkevitch does not relate emergence of
sedimen processing by biomass or eroded chemical elements. If
rebounds of Earth from the Sun in the course of transition to
more distant orbits are the result of Solar system pulsations
then caused by these transitions pulsations of Earth itself gave
life which is adduced on supplementary sheet. Pulsation Ч
|
|
|
synthesis, pulsation Ч synthesis. "Widespread manifestation in
Silur of intrusive magmatism conditioned forming in geosinclinar
zones of ore minerals deposits Ч iron, chrome, copper, various
polymetals... Deposits of metalic minerals are related mainly wi
actively manifested in late-Palaeozoic time. On the territory of
the USSR intrusive and effusive activity in late Palaeozoic time
was the most intensively manifested in the frames of Uralo-T the
deposits of iron ores,... boxites,... copper-pyrites ores,
chromite, platinum, gold, zinc, lead, rare elements ores...
Deposits of polymetals are mainly related with erupted rocks
which are East of Siberia as the result of active magmatism in
Mesozoic period emerged so called Pacific ore belt with which
many deposits of non-ferrous and rare metals are related. Similar
deposits are situated in the eastern part of China and Indochina
Of course, more detailed elaboration of deposits on every
geological period is needed and inside periods Ч on rhythms, but
the action of the scheme is still evident. There must be seven
rhyt conditioned both by the structure of the scheme itself and
by the fact that many chemical elements have SEVEN isotopes. Once
more Vernadsky was right when he stated that "mechanism of the
Earth's crust is conditioned by the properties of atoms it is
formed by; chemical structure of the crust is not accidental".
The fact that processes of orogenesis (Caledonian, Hertzinian,
Alpian) covered a number of geological epochs (periods) is only
the evidence that condensing manifested itself in the same places
(about the rythmical character of the phases of emergence of
deposits of copper and other minerals) are the evidence that
these phases proceeded with FOUR-time rhythm. I.e., if according
to types depending on degree of "metallization" which witnesses
divisibility of their emergence process, than inside of
geological periods the same divisibility is observed. If we look
from the height of hydrogen crown of Earth into the depth of
deposits of the first uranium formations, then we have to agree
with the dasic idea of V.M. Goldschmidt Ч this spiral scheme of c
covers of the Earth both chronologically and in height.
М.А.Князев
Будущее мирового сионизма
Только для посвященных.
Предисловие.
Предисловие появилось уже тогда, когда с работой ознакоми-
лись несколько человек. Потому оно является реакцией как на мнение
первых читателей, так и обращением к последующим.
Бисмарк мог только сказать, что предпочитает учиться на
ошибках других. Жизнь же всех остальных даже самых выдающихся людей
показывает, что опыт чужих ошибок хорош лишь в случаях их повторе-
ния на собственном пути. То же и со знаниями. Информация должна
пройти через процесс мышления, должна быть осознана, сопоставлена с
уже имеющейся в памяти и лишь после раздумий принята или отвергнута.
То, что содержится в настоящей работе, предназначено имен-
ной для этой цели. Для того, чтобы подумать. Именно этому, процессу
самостоятельного мышления, учит хорошая школа. И тому, что за хоро-
шими мыслями должны следовать и хорошие действия.
Поэтому я не стал как первоклашкам "разжевывать" информацию.
Тем, кто готов, этого не надо, а тем, кто нет - бесполезно.
Для тех, кто еще ищет и молод, могу сказать, что более под-
робное рассмотрение "метеоритной" теории кратеров было сделано как
пример именно такой постановки вопроса, когда есть избыток инфор-
мации по теме, но не было до сих пор не только единого, но и пра-
вильного объяснения. А долгая и возможно не вполне читаемая цитата
из работы В.Босенко была дана в представленном объеме для понимания
трудности хода МЫСЛИ на этапе невозможности ее свободного выражения.
Я выражаю безграничную благодарность Лоллию Петровичу За-
мойскому, моему интеллектуальному консультанту, который высказал
несколько очень правильных замечаний по поводу содержания настоящей
книги и стиля ее изложения.
Мне приходится, не изменяя текста, вынести в предисловие то,
на что было обращено внимание.
Когда в главе "Звезды" было сказано: "кругооборот в видимом
мире здесь завершается", - вывод казался неокончательным из-за от-
сутствия в картине взаимодействия вещества планет /Земли/ и вне пла-
нет - самих планетных систем. Здесь как раз подходит термин "относи-
тельность". Но не применительно к теории, описывающей пространствен-
но-временные соотношения, а применительно к отношениям простран-
ственно-структурным. Дело в том, что процесс синтеза-распада-синте-
за, происходящий в звездах, начинается с частиц света и кончается
частицами света, представляющими собой субатомные структуры. Но
происходит этот процесс на субсветовом уровне тех частиц, масса ко-
торых так соотносится с ними, как масса атома относится к массе сол-
нечной системы. Свет является связующей массовой величиной структур:
Галактика-галактика, Галактика-звезда, звезда-планета.
Планеты /планетные системы/ включаются в иной процесс рас-
пада-синтеза, когда в ином времени вещество галактики распадается на
звездные ассоциации, эти в свою очередь - на двойные звездные систе-
мы, а затем, после взрыва сверхновой - на планетные системы. Синтез
мы видим только в отдаленном пространстве, где сломавшиеся, сжавшие-
ся планетные системы вместе со своими звездами вовлекаются в вихрь,
несущий их к центру галактики, уже превращающейся в квазар, рождаю-
щий затем новую галактику. Это одновременно является иной формой
процесса, где распад одной галактики тем самым синтезирует новую
другую.
При этом свет продолжает выполнять свою роль связующей мас-
совой величины.
Внутри планеты /Земли/ синтез химическим элементов, выз-
ванный пульсацией планетной системы, приводит к распаду образован-
ных тяжелых ядер и синтезу минералов, и неописанным пока способом -
к обмену веществ внутри биологичских образований. С помощью, кстати,
того же света.
Попытка совместить эти пространственно-структурные взаи-
моотношения приводит к пониманию разного времени существования таких
структур, которое соотносится друг с другом так, как и массы.
Это схоже с тем, что в разном времени своего жизненного
цикла живет человечество в целом, отдельный человек и... клетка, ко-
торая является вроде бы и незаметной / как сравнение звезды с части-
цей света/, но неотъемлемой частью человека и составляющих его
структур /сердца, желудка.../. Но и в клетке происходит обмен ве-
ществ... А вокруг - ореол частиц; так называемое "биомагнитное поле".
Разница во времени происходящих процессов распада звездных
систем /приблизительно 300 лет от одного до следующего взрыва свер-
хновой в одной Галактике/ приводит к пониманию и того факта, что с
той же периодичностью /в среднем/ происходит и процесс синтеза пла-
нетарной туманности, распадающейся затем на планеты. На одной их них
в ХХ веке начинают на волне 21 см зондировать Космос, но на другой к
этому времени еще /в нашем исчислении/ ХV11 век, а на третьей - ХХШ,
и никаких сигналов в Космос уже не посылают.
Следующее замечание, которое я вынужден сделать, касается
схемы биологической эволюции. Если в схеме химических элементов из-
менена только форма, а сама схема - творение великого Д.И.Менделее-
ва,то схема биологической эволюции - творение автора настоящей ра-
боты. В данном случае вопрос не в том, что такая схема не имеет пра-
ва на существование. Любой физический процесс подпадает под описа-
ние и числовое выражение. Ни у кого не вызывает сомнение, например,
схема демографического роста населенного пункта, составленная в ди-
намике по годам. Процесс вызван миграцией биологических образований
- людей, но их движение - предмет рассмотрения социологии, или, дру-
гим языком - высшей биофизики.
Поэтому здесь уместно ставить вопрос о правильности выбора
опять-таки формы cхемы, а не о том, быть схеме биологической эволю-
ции вообще или не быть. Когда после уточненной датировки границ гео-
логических периодов, сделанных не по останкам животных, а по време-
|
|
|
