| Box 1. 1
| Designing an Evaluation of a Multi-Agency Project and Study Question
|
|
| Box 1. 2
| Types of Research Impact
|
|
| Box 1. 3
| Changes to the Crime Survey for England and Wales
|
|
| Box 1. 4
| Ethnographic and Qualitative Research
|
|
|
| that Addresses the Changing Nature of
|
|
|
| Youth Identities in Contemporary Britain
|
|
| Box 1. 5
| Example of an Abstract
|
|
| Box 1. 6
| Example of the Requirements for a Research Proposal
|
|
| Box 1. 7
| Example of an Abstract
|
|
| Box 2. 1
| Approaches to Doing a Criminological Research Dissertation
|
|
| Box 2. 2
| Useful Literature on Academic Writing and Planning a Dissertation
|
|
| Box 2. 3
| Six Properties of a Researchable Question
|
|
| Box 2. 4
| From Choosing a Topic to Formulating a Research Question
|
|
| Box 2. 5
| Ways of Collecting Data
|
|
| Box 2. 6
| Some Strengths and Weaknesses of Data Collection Methods
|
|
| Box 2. 7
| Types of Sampling Strategies
|
|
| Box 2. 8
| Approaches to Data Analysis
|
|
| Box 2. 9
| Ethical Considerations
|
|
| Box 2. 10
| The Research Proposal
|
|
| Box 3. 1
| Typical Structure of a Student Dissertation
|
|
| Box 3. 2
| Sources of Example Literature Reviews
|
|
| Box 3. 3
| What Does a Narrative Review on Police Corruption Look Like?
|
|
| Box 3. 4
| What Does a Systematic Review of the Effects
|
|
|
| of Improved Street Lighting on Crime Look Like?
|
|
| Box 3. 5
| Narrative Versus Systematic Reviews
|
|
| Box 3. 6
| What Does an Annotation Look Like?
|
|
| Box 3. 7
| Sample Text from a Literature Review
|
|
| Box 4. 1
| Deciding on a Research Strategy
|
|
| Box 4. 2
| Examining the Extent of Sexual Violence Against
|
|
|
| Older People – Freedom of Information Requests
|
|
|
| (Bows and Westmarland, 2017)
|
|
| Box 4. 3
| Police Perceptions of ‘Risk’ in Relation to Older Sex Offenders
|
|
| Box 4. 4
| Young People’s Everyday Lives in Young
|
|
|
| Offenders Institutions in Denmark (Bengtsson, 2016)
|
|
| Box 4. 5
| Visual Methods in Probation Research (Carr et al., 2015)
|
|
| Box 5. 1
| Pragmatism’s Core Principles (Denscombe, 2014: 158)
|
|
| Box 5. 2
| Jaime Waters’ PHD Research (2009) – Illegal
|
|
|
| Drug Use Among Older Adults
|
|
| Box 5. 3
| Vicky Heap’s PHD Research (2010) – Understanding
|
|
|
| Public Perceptions of Anti-Social Behaviour
|
|
| Box 5. 4
| Basic Structure
|
|
| Box 6. 1
| Ontology (The Nature of Social Reality)
|
|
| Box 6. 2
| Epistemology (How we go About Knowing About the
|
|
|
| World and How we Distinguish Between
|
|
|
| What is True and False)
|
|
| Box 6. 3
| HMPSS Research Application Process
|
|
| Box 6. 4
| The Harris Review
|
|
| Box 6. 5
| Deaths in Custody Invitation for Tender (DOH)
|
|
| Box 6. 6
| Stanford Prison Experiment 1971
|
|
| Box 6. 7
| The John Wayne Shift
|
|
| Box 6. 8
| British Society of Criminology 2015 Code of Ethics
|
|
| Box 9. 1
| A Focus on Research with Children
|
|
| Box 9. 2
| Hard-to-Reach Groups
|
|
| Box 9. 3
| ONS Methodological Note (2015)
|
|
| Box 9. 4
| Key Questions that all Researchers
|
|
|
| Should ask when Undertaking any Project
|
|
| Box 9. 5
| Some Typical Survey Questions
|
|
| Box 9. 6
| Examples of Open and Closed Questions
|
|
| Box 9. 7
| Sudman and Bradburn’s Loaded Questions
|
|
| Box 9. 8
| Vignettes used in Public Attitudes to Sex
|
|
|
| Offender Research (Brown et al., 2007)
|
|
| Box 10. 1
| Ways of Describing and Disaggregating the Crime Drop
|
|
| Box 10. 2
| Security Impact Assessment Tool (SIAT)
|
|
| Box 12. 1
| The Needs of and Support for families
|
|
|
| affected by Child Sexual Abuse
|
|
| Box 12. 2
| Systematic Literature Reviews and Analysis – An Example
|
|
| Box 12. 3
| Research Teams and Analysis – An Example
|
|
| Box 12. 4
| Thematic Content Analysis Using NVivo 10 Software
|
|
| Box 12. 5
| Five Characteristics of Conceptual Themes
|
|
| Box 12. 6
| Child Sexual Abuse and Conceptual Themes
|
|
| Box 12. 7
| Analysis for Theory Building
|
|
| Box 12. 8
| Two Hypotheses Being Tested in Data Analysis – An Example
|
|
| Box 13. 1
| The Cambridge Study of Delinquent Development
|
|
| Box 13. 2
| Delinquency in a Birth Cohort
|
|
| Box 13. 3
| The Stockholm Life-Course Project (SLCP)
|
|
| Box 13. 4
| The Glueck Study
|
|
| Box 13. 5
| The Pittsburgh Youth Study
|
|
| Box 14. 1
| Power within Interviews
|
|
| Box 14. 2
| Interviews as Storytelling
|
|
| Box 14. 3
| Critical Research on State Violence
|
|
| Box 14. 4
| Institutional Abuse and its Legacies
|
|
| Box 15. 1
| Definition of Human Trafficking
|
|
| Box 15. 2
| Definitional Issues
|
|
| Box 15. 3
| Research on Human Trafficking
|
|
| Box 15. 4
| Risk Mitigation in the Design and
|
|
|
| Conducting of Research Related to Human Trafficking
|
|
| Box 15. 5
| Making Sense of the Research
|
|
|
| Experience – Promoting Well-being
|
|
| Box 15. 6
| Discourse Analysis
|
|
| Box 16. 1
| The Ordinary of Newgate’s Account of
|
|
|
| the Behaviour, Confession and Dying
|
|
|
| Words of Condemned Criminals
|
|
| Box 16. 2
| The Gluecks’ Infamous Study of Young Offenders
|
|
| Box 16. 3
| Criminal Lives (2007) and Serious Offenders (2010)
|
|
| Box 16. 4
| Peter Scannell
|
|
| Box 16. 5
| Activity – ‘Victim’ Autobiography
|
|
| Box 17. 1
| Overt and Covert Research
|
|
| Box 17. 2
| ‘Going Native’
|
|
| Box 17. 3
| ‘Big Data’
|
|
| Box 17. 4
| Deception, Safety and Confidentiality
|
|
| Box 17. 5
| What is an Ethics Committee?
|
|
| Box 18. 1
| Police Image Making Online
|
|
| Box 18. 2
| Assessing the Extent, Content and
|
|
|
| Social Impact of Online Hate Speech
|
|
| Box 18. 3
| Public Punitiveness Towards Sex Offenders
|
|
| Box 18. 4
| Deviance and Social Control in a Virtual World
|
|
| Box 19. 1
| Research Focussed on Studying Images
|
|
| Box 19. 2
| Luigi Gariglio and Photo Elicitation
|
|
| Box 20. 1
| Understanding ‘Burglary’ Across Jurisdictions
|
|
| Box 20. 2
| Nelken’s Typology of Comparative Methodology
|
|
| Box 20. 3
| Bennett’s Conceptualization of Comparative Studies
|
|
| Box 20. 4
| Chu and Song’s (2015) Comparative Study
|
|
| Box 21. 1
| Example of Case Study and Cross-Case
|
|
|
| Methods to Describe and Explain Student
|
|
|
| Plagiarism in University Assignments
|
|
| Box 21. 2
| Descriptive Case Study and a
|
|
|
| Causal (Exploratory) Case Study
|
|
| Box 21. 3
| Classic Case Studies
|
|
| Box 21. 4
| Case Studies of Crime
|
|
| Box 21. 5
| Case Studies of Justice
|
|
| Box 21. 6
| Comparing Nation States
|
|
| Box 22. 1
| Linking Performance Indicators to Goals
|
|
| Box 22. 2
| Evaluating the Inside Out Prison Program
|
|
| Box 22. 3
| Evaluating a Prisoner Peer Support Programme
|
|
| Box 22. 4
| Evaluating the Post Release Options Project
|
|
