 |
Asssessing Grammar in Writing Context
|
|
|
|
Asssessing Grammar in Writing Context
1. Introduce the definition of grammar type, and illustrate the rule and concept in the grammar lecture.
2. Before beginning the discussion, have the pupils apply their responses to the adjective clause as an assignment.
3. Have the pupils give a presentation, participate in a debate, and ask and answer questions about the content (adjective clause).
4. Have the pupils complete assignments such as a classroom exam.
5. Ask the pupils to write a paragraph about a specific subject involving adjective clause content (grammar in writing context as task based)
6. Ask pupils to reword the incorrect passages in order to correct them. If the pupils look up the mistake again, or if he asks questions about proper use in grammatical situations.
7. Remind the pupils that if they have any grammar questions, they should consult a grammar book. Make sure the pupils understand the rules they broke in the first place. Repeat the procedure with each of the pupils' articles or written texts.
8. Include constructive criticism and positive reviews on their writing.
9. Use the primary trait score to evaluate their writing, with the lecturer focusing solely on the use and application of adjective clauses. The final step is to evaluate the learners' grammar achievement using a multiple-choice test, which allows her to assess the efficacy of the basic learning goal.
Since it focuses on improving comprehension and sees errors as learning opportunities, feedback is one of the most critical elements in evaluation for learning. In other words, feedback demonstrates repeated errors or misunderstandings to pupils and teaches them how to adjust their approach to correct these errors and improve learning.
Efficient feedback is a critical component in assisting pupils in achieving their goals Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). Vygotsky’s theory of the Zone of Proximal Development pupils have a threshold that allows them to function up to a certain level of skill. [40, p. 88-89]. The student can only complete tasks up to this stage while working alone. The student's ZPD may be crossed with intervention or help from an instructor or mediator, enabling them to perform at a higher skill level. This allows pupils to work at a higher level when working in groups or seeking input on an assignment from their instructor through effective feedback.
The intervention takes place when the teacher provides oral or written guidance to the pupils. Scoring and commenting on summative assessments is the standard method of getting reviews. This process, on the other hand, is limited to error correction. The appraisal window has closed, even though the student chose to revise and learn based on error corrections. When it comes to publishing, the same law applies. Instead of dwelling on the pupils' mistakes, educators should concentrate on what they did well and what can be done to change.
Tunstall and Gipps created a teacher input typology that includes two main categories: socialization and evaluation. The term " socialization guidance" refers to the teacher's messages to pupils about how to treat their classmates respectfully in the classroom.
|
|
|
Asssessing Grammar in Speaking Context
One of the grammar-based communicative learning methods is teaching grammar in the form of speech. This approach is used to recall new grammar topics. It can also keep track of their experiences, as well as their knowledge of grammatical outcomes, which they can use to improve their communication. Brown's adaptation of grammar assessment in a speaking context Assessment of oral proficiency with strong grammar and right. The following are the measures for evaluating grammar in a speech context:
a. delegate pupils to collect student responses to the simple present, as well as comparative and superlative degrees of comparative and superlative. As part of their responsibilities prior to the class debate.
b. Form a discussion group that involves the session and material-related questions.
c. Have multiple choice and essay exercises or drills with the pattern present basic materials and degrees of comparative and superlative.
d. Learners engage in a conversation about particular subjects that include basic present content as well as comparative and superlative degrees.
e. Give them feedback and washback on their speaking, focusing on grammar in particular.
f. Evaluate those who focus trait primary evaluation score, which lecturers only assess the application of the simple present and degrees of comparative and superlative.
Self-assessment is an essential, but often ignored, learning method that helps learners reclaim control of their learning. According to Leitch et al., pupils in the classroom lack an active voice, which inhibits involvement. Self-assessment is a method of giving pupils a voice while also improving metacognitive skills and self-esteem. Self-assessment presents difficulties since it is not intuitive; pupils must be educated before they can analyze their own work. Some teachers offer supplementary resources such as rubrics or checklists, as well as exemplars (examples of stellar work) to which pupils can equate their own work in order to accurately self-assess [48, p. 104]
Self-assessment fosters independence by teaching pupils to understand what constitutes " healthy work" in order to achieve the best possible outcomes with their own work. Making inferences and preparing for next steps is one of the primary tenants of theory. Pupils must have intrinsic, or internal, learning objectives that they strive for in order to develop autonomy. As a result, the teacher's job becomes to create a risk-free learning atmosphere that promotes pupils' emotional and psychological well-being. To achieve this aim, pupils must be taught how to effectively self-assess, which for younger pupils frequently necessitates the use of mediating objects such as posters or signs. These techniques were put into practice by the EFL teachers who participated in the research, so they are explained in great detail.
Traffic lights, thumbs up/down, and smiley faces are examples of self-assessment approaches used in the classroom. All three tools work in the same way: after the instructor has explained the class's material, the pupils are asked whether they understand the basic concepts or if further detail is required. When it comes to traffic lights, pupils hold up a green light to indicate that they have grasped the concept and are ready to move on; a yellow light indicates that they are still unsure; and a red light indicates that they are still unsure. Thumbs up/down and smiley faces are similar to this technique, but instead of a red light, a sad face or thumbs down are used.
|
|
|
All are easy and fast forms of self-assessment that enable the teacher to assess the pupils' comprehension of the material in real time. Traffic lights help pupils, especially lower achievers, articulate their lack of understanding in a way that does not expose them to criticism or humiliation in front of their peers, in addition to engaging them in the use of visual aids. To put it another way, holding up a red card is much preferable to lifting one's hand and saying, " I don't understand, " in front of a group of peers. It fosters a sense of equity or inclusion for pupils who feel marginalized in the classroom and ensures that healthy emotional and psychological conditions are established in the classroom.
Although traffic lights, smiley faces, and thumbs up/down provide instantaneous self-assessment with minimal classroom time, these strategies do not provide insight into concepts that need further explanation. Some teachers supplement traffic lights with meta-reflection at the end of each class or unit in order to determine this logic. This type of reflection includes having pupils write " minute articles, " which are brief summaries of the subject, at the end of the lesson, enabling them to reflect on their information retrospectively. Keeping a daily reflection journal helps pupils to look back on what they have struggled with in the past, enhancing their morale as they see how much they have progressed on each point [37, p. 347].
During my study, I looked into testing grammar by using communicative exercises to test learners' capacity and abilities in using English, in order to address the following research query:
1) How do teachers measure grammar in the classroom by using communicative exercises to test pupils' ability to use English?
2) How do communicative exercises measure learners' competence and ability to use English to assess their attitudes toward learning grammar?
This research used a qualitative case study approach to look at testing grammar by using communicative exercises to test learners' English skills and abilities.
Data was collected over the course of my practice at school No19. One planned pre-study interview with each of the two teachers was one of the data sources. The interview questions were structured to elicit information about the teachers' perspectives on grammar assessment and teaching, as well as various approaches to grammar instruction, such as grammar corrections. Other questions sought to learn more about the teachers' actual teaching practices as well as the factors that affected their approach and strategy choices.
Interviews were the main research instrument used to learn about teachers' attitudes toward grading grammar classes. Every teacher was scheduled for three one-hour interviews: a pre-study interview to determine the context of their experience, a pre-lesson interview to gather information about the lesson to be applied, and a post-lesson interview to assist the teachers in reflecting on the significance of the entire experience. Many of the interviews were recorded on tape.
The data from the learners' responses was collected using a questionnaire before and after the teaching and learning of grammar, which was done using communicative exercises to determine the learners' abilities and ability to use English. The survey was in the form of a multiple-choice format. The results of questionnaires reveal whether the pupils enjoyed teaching and studying grammar.
|
|
|
Assessing grammar skills and abilities in declarative and procedural awareness using a communicative approach in grammar class revealed that having certain types of tasks evaluating the learners' grammar skill and ability made the learners' grammar class more difficult. It piqued their interest in learning grammar and motivated them to do so.
According to the findings of the interviews, both teachers believe that teaching grammar is critical in enabling pupils to correctly use grammar structures in writing and speaking. The pupils also had the understanding and ability to use the grammar item in voice, writing, as well as listening and reading comprehension. While both teachers agreed that learners do not need to be able to directly clarify grammar rules, they both agreed that if they can correctly apply these rules and structures in sentences, they would make less grammatical errors in their speech and writing.
Teaching grammar through communicative practices is a strategy that is much more successful than teaching grammar as a separate subject or in a traditional setting. However, we must first include the definition, the grammar pattern, and some drills or practice exercises. Then we make the pupils use it in their writing.
There are no miracles in this town. That is, simply teaching grammar in the sense of writing does not guarantee that the principle will be remembered and applied indefinitely. On the contrary, grammatical concepts must often be taught and retaught to individuals as well as groups or classes, and pupils continue to need assistance in putting what they have learned into practice.
The evaluation of grammatical capacity has taken an interesting turn in some contexts, according to the two teachers in this case study. Grammatical capacity has been measured in the sense of language usage by speaking and writing tests. As a result, grammatical knowledge is no longer included as a separate and clear aspect of communicative language capacity in the form of a separate subtest in some exams. In other words, the pupils' declarative and procedural grammar skills, as well as other aspects of communicative language capacity (such as subject, organization, and register), are assessed.
Tables 1 and 2 below outline the reasons for teachers and pupils liking or not liking those forms of grammar evaluation assignments, based on a literature review and interviews with teachers and pupils. Regrettably, I've learned that not all teachers are conscious of the presence and importance of authentic tasks for evaluating grammar skills. In addition, pupils are dissatisfied with the objectivity of their grades, and many of them believe that both grammar learning and evaluation are inefficient.
Tasks for assessing grammar skills: benefits and drawbacks In the tables below, tasks 1-7 are conventional, language-centered tasks, tasks 8-10 are semi-authentic, and task 11 is authentic. It means that a) we never do or need gap filling or multiple choice in real life, b) we frequently write letters, talk with each other (dialogue) or in front of a group (monologue), and c) we only do or need gap filling or multiple choice on occasion.
|
|
|
