 |
Complete the sentences using adjectives in the correct degree of comparison.
|
|
|
|
1. ……reform took place earlier than reform in………
2. ……reform was more complicated than ………reform
3. The reform in ……….was as ………as ……….reform.
4. ……………..reform was the most……………..
Make expressions using each word once. Find them in the text above and read the sentences with them
| wage mechanized supplementary village long-term absentee large-scale formal | payments affairs workers emancipation measure operation agriculture landlords |
Translate the text.
Other recent reforms.
Attempts to reform the agrarian structure have been made in most other countries, with varying degrees of seriousness. India and Pakistan have concentrated on abolishing intermediaries who prevailed as survivals of traditional and feudal tenures. In India the tenants have become hereditary holders, with the title vested in the state. India has left reform to the states and emphasized peaceful and compensatory methods; hence the results have varied from one state to another. Pakistan, following the revolution of 1958, enacted a reform that made most of the tenants owners. In both countries, however, small-scale farming has persisted, while Pakistan has continued to tolerate and protect owners of up to 500 acres (200 hectares). In neither country has fragmentation been effectively reduced or have capital formation and cultivation methods significantly advanced.
In contrast, after the Communists came to power in China, private ownership was eliminated and the peasants were organized in village communes. Extensive supplementary measures have been tried, and the role and organization of the commune have varied according to the pressures on the economy. The most recent innovation in China's agriculture has been the “production responsibility system,” which allows the commune to contract with its members for quotas of output; the members are free to sell the surplus on the open market. The change is seen as an incentive generator, but land cannot be rented, bought, sold, or used except as authorized by the commune. The effects of China's agrarian policy on peasant living conditions and the Chinese economy have been generally accepted as positive, genuine, and impressive.
In 1962 Iran made owners of most of the former sharecroppers, in the classic tradition of Western-type reform, mainly to create political stability. Given Iran's revolution of 1979, however, the reform evidently was not sufficient to sustain the old social order. Reform was also introduced in Syria, Iraq, Algeria, Libya, and other countries of the Middle East and North Africa following independence or revolution. Most of these reforms were influenced by the Egyptian example, with the state playing a major role. In all cases emphasis has been placed on farm cooperatives, although they have been largely ineffective.
In contrast, tropical Africa has witnessed a wave of innovative reform in recent years. Reform has sometimes come in “packages,” which combine tenure reform and other measures affecting cultivation and productivity. Among the innovations is the “villagization,” or ujamaa, program of Tanzania, according to which a group of families lives, works, and makes decisions together and shares the costs and benefits of farming the land. The program began as a voluntary movement in 1967, but by 1977 it had become almost mandatory. At the same time, “block farming” and individual holdings had become acceptable forms of cooperation. The Ujamaa Villages Act of 1975 made the village the main rural administration and development unit. The most radical reforms in Africa, however, have been those of Ethiopia in 1975 and of Mozambique in 1979. Both vested the land title in the nation and abolished rent, sale, and absentee control of the land. The land was placed in the hands of the tillers, who have guaranteed right of use for themselves and for their descendants. Except in the public sector, farming is a small, family operation with a high degree of equality of landholding but of uncertain efficiency.
|
|
|
Find equivalents.
1. условия жизни крестьян
2. земля была передана в руки фермеров
3. продолжал терпеть и защищать собственников
4. обширные дополнительные меры
5. отмена посреднических услуг
6. приемлемые формы сотрудничества
7. мирные и уравновешивающие методы
8. старый общественный порядок
Answer the questions.
1. In what country the effects of agrarian policy have been accepted as positive, genuine and impressive?
2. What is “villagization”?
3. What reform did Pakistan after the revolution of 1958 enact?
4. Why were the reforms in Ethiopia and Mozambique the most radical?
Complete the sentences.
1. …………… were influenced by the Egyptian example, with the state playing a major role.
2. In ………. the tenants have become ………….., with the title vested in the state.
3. In contrast, ………….. has witnessed a wave of innovative reform in ……………..
4. The change is seen as ……., but land cannot be rented, bought, sold, or used ……. by the commune.
5. Reform was also introduced in …………………….. following independence or revolution.
Write nationalities of the listed countries
China, India, Pakistan, Syria, Iraq, Algeria, Libya, Tanzania, Ethiopia, Mozambique
Translate the text.
Conclusions
Land reform and agrarian reforms have become synonymous, indicating that reform programs have become more comprehensive and encompass much more than the reform of land tenure or land distribution. Reform movements have recurred throughout history, as have the crises they are intended to deal with, because reform has rarely dealt with the roots of the crises. Reform has served as a problem-solving mechanism and therefore has only been extensive enough to cope with the immediate crisis. Reformers have often faced hard choices: to promote and sustain private ownership with inequality or to institute public or collective ownership with equality but with restrictions on the individuals private interests; to spread employment by supporting labour-intensive, low-productivity techniques or to promote high productivity through capital-intensive, efficient methods; to pursue gradual “repair and maintenance” reform that is basically ineffective or to promote revolutionary, comprehensive, effective but disruptive reform. In capitalist reforms these contradictions have usually been resolved in favour of the first set of options; in socialist reforms, in favour of the second. Land tenure reform seems to have been of little significance in creating substantive economic change, although it has been important for improving the status of peasants and maintaining social and political stability. Most reforms have narrowed the gap between reform beneficiaries and other farmers through land redistribution and tenancy control, but only the comprehensive socialist reforms have narrowed the gap between agriculture and other sectors of the economy.
|
|
|
Land redistribution programs have had limited success for several reasons. They often have deprived the farm of the former landlord's contributions without providing a substitute. They have inhibited mobility of labour by giving the peasant a stake in the land, though only in the form of an inefficient minifarm. They frequently have threatened large, efficiently run farms and therefore have had to be compromised. They have provided compensation for the expropriated land and hence left wealth and income distribution largely unaffected. They have been conditional upon peasant participation in social and political activity and cooperative organization, even though the peasant was unprepared for these activities. Moreover, the redistribution of land has rarely been fortified by protective measures that could prevent reconcentration of ownership and the recurrence of crises. Nevertheless, major efforts have been expended by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and other international bodies and by governments to devise viable frameworks for solving agricultural and rural problems emanating from defective agrarian structures.
Find equivalents.
1. часто сталкивались с трудным выбором
2. препятствовали передвижению рабочей силы
3. служила механизмом для решения проблем
4. заполнили пробел между лицами, получающими экономическую выгоду
5. важный для улучшения статуса крестьян
6. трудоемкие низкопродуктивные технологии
Answer the questions.
1. What reforms have become synonymous?
2. What do reform movements deal with?
3. How do land redistribution programs influence on success?
4. What reforms have narrowed the gap between agriculture and other sectors of economy?
5. What is a set of options favorable for capitalist reforms?
6. What is a set of options favorable for socialist reforms?
Complete the sentences.
1. Reform movements have recurred …………., as have the crises they are intended to deal with, because …………. with the roots of the crises.
2. ……………… the farm of the former landlord's contributions without providing a substitute.
3. They have been conditional upon ………….. in social and political activity and cooperative organization, even though ………………………...
4. Land reform and ……………….. have become synonymous, indicating that reform programs have become …………………than the reform of land tenure or land distribution.
5. ………. have threatened large, efficiently run farms and therefore have had to be ………...
|
|
|
