 |
TERMINOLOGY IS NOT SO AND SAFE
|
|
|
|
TERMINOLOGY IS NOT SO AND SAFE
The term " Science". In this philosophy, it denotes all existing scientific knowledge and begins with a capital letter. But if the term " science" begins with a lowercase letter, then we are talking about a private science. We are not asking everyone to follow this example, but the problem of unambiguous terminology must be addressed.
The term " Being" is here synonymous with the terms " real Universe" and " real World". This is all there is now. These terms here begin with a capital letter, because their objects are so large that the hand itself does not raise them to start with a lowercase letter. But if the term " being" means existence, then it is already written with a lowercase letter. However, this term is almost never used here, since there is a term " existence". And if the term " world" means a set, then it is also written with a lowercase letter.
The term " Material Unity of the World" is a key term in materialistic philosophy. It denotes the material system of the entire universe. In fact, it is synonymous with the term " universe".
Philosophy strives for unambiguous, clear and understandable terminology. This is called the desire to formalize knowledge. One term, one meaning. For example, why do we need the term " universe" when there is an understandable term " Universe"? Moreover, the term " universe" has already been given its meaning by idealistic philosophy.
Principle 1 a. The Trojan Horse
The terminology is far from being as harmless as it seems at first glance, because together with some terms we willy-nilly often inherit those false meanings that they have ever denoted before. (1. 1. 0. ) 1 a
Why does philosophy need these Trojan horses?
EXISTING
Every available material or informational object is an existing object. Each available quality of an object, as well as each of its quantities, are also existing objects. Every available relationship and every relationship of objects are also existing objects. But what is already or not yet, does not belong to the category of existence.
Principle 2. The law of existence
Every existing object is always and necessarily a real object. It is in stock now. (1. 1. 0. ) 2
And what does not exist, then it is either a no longer existing object, or an object that does not yet exist, since it is nothing more than nothing. Facts about already non-existent objects are real informational entities and legal representatives of their once real objects. Fact is existent. It really is in stock. An absent fact is nothing. There are no facts about objects that do not yet exist and cannot be. It's clear.
|
|
|
As for truth, any truth arises only from its object and only through its fact. All facts are based only on real-life objects or on those that once existed.
The existence of any object is its presence in reality. The reality of an object is not its quality, since it has no measure. After all, there is no more or less existing object. The reality of an object is its presence now. It is the item itself. And reality without an object is “non-objective reality”.
Being is an element or a fragment of the real World (Being). “EXISTING, -th, -he. 1. Existing, existing (obsolete high) ". (Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language. M.: Azbukovnik, 1999)
According to Aristotle: “So, being, when it is, must be; in the same way, the non-being, when it is not, must not be". ( Aristotle. Works. T. 2. M., " Thought", 1978. р. 102)
LIKE KNOWN LIKE
Any private science " understands" in each of its subjects only what its own knowledge allows. The main factor in the limited knowledge of private science is the boundaries of its subject area.
Principle 3
The subject area of private science is only a certain area of all that is investigated by it. And any object (essence) existing in this area is thus the subject of this science. The fact of a no longer existing object is its corresponding representative. (1. 1. 0. ) 3
Philosophy, on the other hand, does not have the limitations of its subject area. Therefore, she “understands” each of her subjects with a system of her own knowledge, which, in principle, have no limitations.
Principle 3 a
Only philosophy, due to its unlimited subject area, is fundamentally capable of possessing a closed system of its principles. And private science, possessing only a limited subject area, is fundamentally capable of possessing only a limited system of its principles. (1. 1. 0. ) 3 a
Private science itself limited its knowledge to the fact that it limited its subject area. Don't confuse just cause and effect.
CLOSED SYSTEM OF PRINCIPLES
Principles are speech, verbal formulas of any science. Our philosophy already has its own closed system of true principles. A closed system of true principles of philosophy is precisely what defines philosophy as a world outlook science. It is closed because it does not " bypass" any key moment of its subject area. There are no breaks in the system of principles of this philosophy, no significant " white spots". The basis of a closed system of principles is that everything in nature is connected. This is the whole essence of the dialectical approach. As Parmenides said: " I don't care where to start, for again I will return to the same place". (Fragments of early Greek philosophers. Part 1. M.: " Science". 1989. р. 295)
|
|
|
The system of principles differs from their piling up in that the principles of the system do not contradict, but support each other. But only true principles are capable of this. Only they have their mutual agreement (harmony). There is no false harmony.
" Everything is connected. " This well-known truth comes from Heraclitus. Any existing material object is not isolated from others. For example, each elementary particle has its own fields, the actions of which extend to the fields of other quanta of matter. And any given is not able to exist outside of its material carrier. This is what is indifferent to connections, so it is the physical space itself.
|
|
|
