 |
Таблица 14. Уровни рекомендаций для склеротерапии 5 страница
|
|
|
|
30. Caprini J. Thrombosis risk assessment as a guide to quality patient care. Disease-a-Month. 2005; 51(2-3): 70-78. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. disamonth. 2005. 02. 003
31. Wittens C, Davies AH, Bæ kgaard N, Broholm R, Cavezzi A, Chastanet S, de Wolf M, Eggen C, Giannoukas A, Gohel M, Kakkos S, Lawson J, Nop- peney T, Onida S, Pittaluga P, Thomis S, Toonder I, Vuylsteke M, Commit- tee EG, Kolh P, de Borst GJ, Chakfé N, Debus S, Hinchliffe R, Koncar I, Lindholt J, de Ceniga MV, Vermassen F, Verzini F, Reviewers D, De Mae- seneer MG, Blomgren L, Hartung O, Kalodiki E, Korten E, Lugli M, Nay- lor R, Nicolini P, Rosales A. Editor’s choice — management of chronic venous disease. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2015; 49(6): 678-737. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. ejvs. 2015. 02. 007
32. Pavlović M, Schuller-Petrović S, Pichot O, Rabe E, Maurins U, Morrison N, Pannier F. Guidelines of the first international consensus conference on endovenous thermal ablation for varicose vein disease — ETAV consensus meeting 2012. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2014; 30(4): 257-273. https: //doi. org/10. 1177/0268355514524568
33. Caprini J, Arcelus JI, Hasty JH, Tamhane C, Fabrega F. Clinical assessment of venous thromboembolic risk in surgical patients. Semin Thromb Hemost. 1991; 17: 304-312.
34. Лобастов К. В., Баринов В. Е., Счастливцев И. В., Лаберко Л. А. Шкала Caprinin как инструмент для индивидуальной стратификации риска развития послеоперационных венозных тромбоэмболий в группе высокого риска. Хирургия. Журнал им. Н. И. Пирогова. 2014; 12: 16-23. [Lobastov KV, Barinov VE, Schastlivtsev IV, Laberko LA. Caprinin score as individual risk assessment model of postoperative venous thromboembolism in patients with high surgical risk. Khirurgiia. 2014; 12: 16-23. (In Russ. )].
35. Bahl V, Hu H, Henke P, Wakefield T, Campbell D, Caprini J. A validation study of a retrospective venous thromboembolism risk scoring method. Ann Surg. 2010; 251(2): 344-350. https: //doi. org/10. 1097/sla. 0b013e3181b7fca6
36. Testroote M, Wittens C. Prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing surgical treatment of varicose veins. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2013; 28(1suppl): 86-90. https: //doi. org/10. 1177/0268355512475121
37. Kane K, Fisher T, Bennett M, Shutze WJr, Hicks T, Grimsley B, Gable D, Pearl G, Smith B, Shutze WSr. The incidence and outcome of endothermal heat-induced thrombosis after endovenous laser ablation. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014; 28(7): 1744-1750. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. avsg. 2014. 05. 005
38. Rhee S, Cantelmo N, Conrad M, Stoughton J. Factors influencing the in- cidence of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT). Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2013; 47(3): 207-212. https: //doi. org/10. 1177/1538574413478494
|
|
|
39. Российские клинические рекомендации по диагностике, лечению и профилактике венозных тромбоэмболических осложнений. Флеболо- гия. 2015; 9(4): 1-52. [Rossiiskie klinicheskie rekomendatsii po diagnostike, lecheniyu i profilaktike venoznykh tromboembolicheskikh oslozhnenii. Flebologiia. 2015; 9(4): 1-52. (In Russ. )].
40. Rutgers P, Kitslaar P. Randomized trial of stripping versus high ligation combined with sclerotherapy in the treatment of the incompetent greater saphenous vein. The American Journal of Surgery. 1994; 168(4): 311-315. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/s0002-9610(05)80155-2
41. Dwerryhouse S, Davies B, Harradine K, Earnshaw J. Stripping the long saphenous vein reduces the rate of reoperation for recurrent varicose veins: five-year results of a randomized trial. J Vasc Surg. 1999; 29(4): 589-592. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/s0741-5214(99)70302-2
42. Holme JB, Skajaa K, Holme K. Incidence of lesions of the saphenous nerve after partial or complete stripping of the long saphenous vein. Acta Chir Scand. 1990; 156(2): 145-148.
43. Van Der Stricht J. Saphenectomy by invagination by thread. Press Med. 1963; 71: 1081-1082.
44. Fullarton G, Calvert M. Intraluminal long saphenous vein stripping: a technique minimizing perivenous tissue trauma. British Journal of Surgery. 1987; 74(4): 255-255. https: //doi. org/10. 1002/bjs. 1800740410
45. Oesch A. Pin-Stripping: a novel method of atraumatic stripping. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 1993; 8(4): 171-173. https: //doi. org/10. 1177/026835559300800409
46. Goren G, Yellin A. Invaginated axial saphenectomy by a semirigid stripper: Perforate-invaginate stripping. J Vasc Surg. 1994; 20(6): 970-977. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/0741-5214(94)90235-6
47. Menyhei G, Gyevná r Z, Arató E, Kelemen O, Kollá r L. Conventional strip- ping versus cryostripping: a prospective randomised trial to compare im- provement in quality of life and complications. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2008; 35(2): 218-223. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. ejvs. 2007. 08. 017
48. Klem T, Schnater J, Schü tte P, Hop W, van der Ham A, Wittens C. A rand- omized trial of cryo stripping versus conventional stripping of the great sa- phenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 2009; 49(2): 403-409. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. jvs. 2008. 09. 016
49. Winterborn R, Foy C, Earnshaw J. Causes of varicose vein recurrence: Late results of a randomized controlled trial of stripping the long saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 2004; 40(4): 634-639. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. jvs. 2004. 07. 003
50. Gloviczki P, Comerota A, Dalsing M, Eklof BG, Gillespie DL, Glo- viczki ML, Lohr JM, Mclafferty RB, Meissner MH, Murad MH, Padberg FT, Pappas PJ, Passman MA, Raffetto JD, Vasquez MA, Wakefield TW. The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the society for vascular surgery and the Amer- ican venous forum. J Vasc Surg. 2011; 53(5): 2S-48S. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. jvs. 2011. 01. 079
51. Lurie F, Makarova N. Clinical dynamics of varicose disease in patients with high degree of venous reflux during conservative treatment and after surgery: 7-year follow-up. International Journal of Angiology. 1998; 7(3): 234-237. https: //doi. org/10. 1007/s005479900103
|
|
|
52. Dermody M, O’Donnell T, Balk E. Complications of endovenous ablation in randomized controlled trials. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 2013; 1(4): 427-436. e1. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. jvsv. 2013. 04. 007
53. Corder AP, Schache DJ, Farquharson SM, Tristram S. Wound infection following high saphenous ligation. A trial comparing two skin closure techniques: subcuticular polyglycolic acid and interrupted monofilament nylon mattress sutures. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1991; 36(2): 100-102.
54. Mekako A, Chetter I, Coughlin P, Hatfield J, McCollum P. Randomized clinical trial of co-amoxiclav versus no antibiotic prophylaxis in varicose vein surgery. British Journal of Surgery. 2009; 97(1): 29-36. https: //doi. org/10. 1002/bjs. 6849
55. Асланов Б. И., Зуева Л. П., Колосовская Е. Н., Любимова А. В., Хоро- шилов В. Ю., Долгий А. А., Дарьина М. Г., Техова И. Г. Принципы ор- ганизации периоперационной антибиотикопрофилактики в учрежде- ниях здравоохранения. Федеральные клинические рекомендации. Под ред. Брико Н. И., Брусина Е. Б., Стасенко В. Л. М. 2014; 42. [Aslanov BI, Zueva LP, Kolosovskaya EN, Lyubimova AV, Khoroshilov VYu, Dolgii AA, Dar’ina MG, Tekhova IG. Printsipy organizatsii perioperatsionnoi antibio- tikoprofilaktiki v uchrezhdeniyakh zdravookhraneniya. Federal’nye klin- icheskie rekomendatsii. Pod red. Briko NI, Brusina EB, Stasenko VL. M. 2014; 42. (In Russ. )].
56. Critchley G, Handa A, Maw A, Harvey A, Harvey MR, Corbett CRR. Complications of varicose vein surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997; 79(2): 105- 110.
57. Ramasastry SS, Dick GO, Futrell JW. Anatomy of the saphenous nerve: relevance to saphenous vein stripping. Am Surg. 1987; 53(5): 274-277.
58. Cox S, Wellwood J, Martin A. Saphenous nerve injury caused by stripping of the long saphenous vein. BMJ. 1974; 1(5905): 415-417. https: //doi. org/10. 1136/bmj. 1. 5905. 415
59. De Alvarenga Yoshida R, Yoshida W, Sardenberg T, Sobreira M, Rollo H, Moura R. Fibular nerve injury after small saphenous vein surgery. Ann Vasc Surg. 2012; 26(5): 729. e11-e729. e15.
https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. avsg. 2011. 11. 042
60. Atkin G, Round T, Vattipally V, Das S. Common peroneal nerve injury as a complication of short saphenous vein surgery. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2007; 22(1): 3-7. https: //doi. org/10. 1258/026835507779700653
61. Rudströ m H, Bjö rck M, Bergqvist D. Yatrogenic vascular injuries in varicose vein surgery: a systematic review. World J Surg. 2007; 31(1): 228-233. https: //doi. org/10. 1007/s00268-006-0492-8
62. Passariello F, Goldman M, Mordon S, Corcos L, Vaghi M, Gonzales R. The mechanism of action of LASER and radiofrequency in great saphenouse vein thermal ablation. Acta Phlebol. 2010; 11(2): 35-39.
63. Corcos L, Dini S, Anna D, Marangoni O, Ferlaino E, Procacci T, Spina T, Dini M. The immediate effects of endovenous diode 808-nm laser in the greater saphenous vein: Morphologic study and clinical implications. J Vasc Surg. 2005; 41(6): 1018-1024. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. jvs. 2005. 03. 002
64. Proebstle T, Lehr H, Kargl A, Espinola-Klein C, Rother W, Bethge S, Knop J. Endovenous treatment of the greater saphenous vein with a 940-nm diode laser: Thrombotic occlusion after endoluminal thermal damage by laser-generated steam bubbles. J Vasc Surg. 2002; 35(4): 729-736. https: //doi. org/10. 1067/mva. 2002. 121132
65. Min RJ, Khilnani N, Zimmet SE. Endovenous laser treatment of saphenous vein reflux: long-term results. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003; 14(8): 991-996.
66. Fan C, Rox-Anderson R. Endovenous laser ablation: mechanism of action. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2008; 23(5): 206-213. https: //doi. org/10. 1258/phleb. 2008. 008049
|
|
|
67. Vuylsteke M, Mordon S. Endovenous laser ablation: a review of mechanisms of action. Ann Vasc Surg. 2012; 26(3): 424-433. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. avsg. 2011. 05. 037
68. Boné Salat C. Tratamiento endoluminal de las varices con laser de diodo: estudio preliminar. Rev Patol Vasc. 1999; 5: 35-46.
69. Siah M, Abramowitz S, Haser P, Ricotta J, Woo E, Macsata R. Evaluating the venous experience in vascular surgery training. Journal of Vascular Sur- gery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 2017; 5(3): 446-452. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. jvsv. 2017. 01. 015
70. Disselhoff B, Rem A, Verdaasdonk R, Kinderen D, Moll F. Endovenous laser ablation: an experimental study on the mechanism of action. Phlebol- ogy: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2008; 23(2): 69-76. https: //doi. org/10. 1258/phleb. 2007. 007038
71. Van der Velden S, Biemans A, De Maeseneer M, Kockaert MA, Cuypers PW, Hollestein LM, Neumann HAM, Nijsten T, van den Bos RR. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial of conventional surgery, endovenous laser ablation and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy in patients with great saphenous varicose veins. British Journal of Surgery. 2015; 102(10): 1184- 1194. https: //doi. org/10. 1002/bjs. 9867
72. Carradice D, Mekako A, Mazari F, Samuel N, Hatfield J, Chetter I. Rand- omized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation compared with conven- tional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins. British Journal of Surgery. 2011; 98(4): 501-510. https: //doi. org/10. 1002/bjs. 7394
73. Proebstle T, Vago B, Alm J, Gö ckeritz O, Lebard C, Pichot O. Treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein by endovenous radiofrequency pow- ered segmental thermal ablation: first clinical experience. J Vasc Surg. 2008; 47(1): 151-156. e1. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. jvs. 2007. 08. 056
74. Nordon I, Hinchliffe R, Brar R, Moxey P, Black SA, Thompson MM, Loftus IM. A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of radi- ofrequency ersus laser treatment of the great saphenous vein in patients with varicose veins. Ann Surg. 2011; 254(6): 876-881. https: //doi. org/10. 1097/sla. 0b013e318230af5a
75. Merchant R, Pichot O. Long-term outcomes of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration of saphenous reflux as a treatment for superficial venous insuf- ficiency. J Vasc Surg. 2005; 42(3): 502-510. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. jvs. 2005. 05. 007
76. Flessenkä mper I, Hartmann M, Hartmann K, Stenger D, Roll S. End- ovenous laser ablation with and without high ligation compared to high liga- tion and stripping for treatment of great saphenous varicose veins: results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial with up to 6 years follow-up. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2014; 31(1): 23-33. https: //doi. org/10. 1177/0268355514555547
77. Nesbitt C, Bedenis R, Bhattacharya V, Stansby G. Endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser) and foam sclerotherapy versus open surgery for great saphenous vein varices. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014. https: //doi. org/10. 1002/14651858. cd005624. pub3
78. Rasmussen L, Lawaetz M, Serup J, Bjoern L, Vennits B, Blemings A, Eklof B. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins with 3-year follow-up. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 2013; 1(4): 349-356. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. jvsv. 2013. 04. 008
79. Almeida J, Kaufman J, Gö ckeritz O, Chopra P, Evans MT, Hoheim DF, Makhoul RG, Richards T, Wenzel C, Raines JK. Radiofrequency end- ovenous closure FAST versus laser ablation for the treatment of great saphe- nous reflux: a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized study (RECOVERY Study). Journal of Vascular and interventional Radiology. 2009; 20(6): 752-759. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. jvir. 2009. 03. 008
|
|
|
80. Gale S, Lee J, Walsh M, Wojnarowski D, Comerota A. A randomized, controlled trial of endovenous thermal ablation using the 810-nm wavelength laser and the ClosurePLUS radiofrequency ablation methods for superficial venous insufficiency of the great saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 2010; 52(3): 645-650. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. jvs. 2010. 04. 030
81. Goode S, Chowdhury A, Crockett M, Beech A, Simpson R, Richards T, Braithwaite BD. Laser and radiofrequency ablation study (LARA study): a randomised study comparing radiofrequency ablation and endovenous laser ablation (810 nm). European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2010; 40(2): 246-253. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. ejvs. 2010. 02. 026
82. Шайдаков Е. В., Илюхин Е. А., Петухов А. В., Григорян А. Г., Росухов- ский Д. А. Радиочастотная облитерация ClosureFAST и эндовазальная лазерная облитерация 1470 нм: многоцентровое проспективное не- рандомизированное исследование. Флебология. 2012; 6(3): 20-27. [Shai- dakov EV, Iliukhin EA, Petukhov AV, Grigorian AG, Rosukhobskii DA. Endovenous radiofrequency obliteration with the ClosureFAST procedure versus 1470 nm laser ablation for treatment of great saphenous vein reflux: a multicenter prospective non-randomized study. Flebologiya. 2012; 6(3): 20-27. (In Russ. )].
83. Shepherd A, Gohel M, Brown L, Metcalfe M, Hamish M, Davies A. Ran- domized clinical trial of VNUS ClosureFAST radiofrequency ablation versus laser for varicose veins. British Journal of Surgery. 2010; 97(6): 810-818. https: //doi. org/10. 1002/bjs. 7091
84. Van Groenendael L, van der Vliet J, Flinkenflö gel L, Roovers E, van Sterk- enburg S, Reijnen M. Treatment of recurrent varicose veins of the great sa- phenous vein by conventional surgery and endovenous laser ablation. J Vasc Surg. 2009; 50(5): 1106-1113. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. jvs. 2009. 06. 057
85. Theivacumar N, Gough M. Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) to treat recur- rent varicose veins. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2011; 41(5): 691-696. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. ejvs. 2011. 01. 018
86. Nwaejike N, Srodon P, Kyriakides C. Endovenous laser ablation for the treatment of recurrent varicose vein disease — a single centre experience. International Journal of Surgery. 2010; 8(4): 299-301. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. ijsu. 2010. 02. 012
87. Starodubtsev V, Lukyanenko M, Karpenko A, Ignatenko P. Endovenous laser ablation in patients with wide diameter of the proximal segment of the great saphenous vein: comparison of methods. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2014; 30(10): 700-705. https: //doi. org/10. 1177/0268355514555546
88. Dabbs E, Mainsiouw L, Holdstock J, Price B, Whiteley M. A description of the ‘smile sign’ and multi-pass technique for endovenous laser ablation of large diameter great saphenous veins. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2017 Jan 1; 026835551773448. https: //doi. org/10. 1177/0268355517734480
89. Riesenman P, de Fritas D, Konigsberg S, Kasirajan K. Noninterruption of warfarin therapy is safe and does not compromise outcome in patients un- dergoing endovenous laser therapy (EVLT). Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2011; 45(6): 524-526. https: //doi. org/10. 1177/1538574411414302
90. Delaney C, Russell D, Iannos J, Spark J. Is endovenous laser ablation pos- sible while taking warfarin? Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2012; 27(5): 231-234. https: //doi. org/10. 1258/phleb. 2011. 011031
91. Lip G, Douketis J. Perioperative management of patients receiving antico- agulants [Electronic resource]. Uptodatecom. 2018. Available at: https: //www. uptodate. com/contents/perioperative-management-of- patients-receiving-anticoagulants#!
92. Mekako A, Hatfield J, Bryce J, Heng M, Lee D, McCollum P, Chetter I. combined endovenous laser therapy and ambulatory phlebectomy: refine- ment of a new technique. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2006; 32(6): 725-729. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. ejvs. 2006. 06. 002
93. Carradice D, Mekako A, Hatfield J, Chetter I. Randomized clinical trial of concomitant or sequential phlebectomy after endovenous laser therapy for varicose veins. British Journal of Surgery. 2009; 96(4): 369-375. https: //doi. org/10. 1002/bjs. 6556
|
|
|
94. Monahan D. Can phlebectomy be deferred in the treatment of varicose veins?
J Vasc Surg. 2005; 42(6): 1145-1149. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. jvs. 2005. 08. 034
95. Welch H. Endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein may avert phle- bectomy for branch varicose veins. J Vasc Surg. 2006; 44(3): 601-605. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. jvs. 2006. 06. 003
96. Marsden G, Perry M, Kelley K, Davies A. Diagnosis and management of varicose veins in the legs: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2013; 347(jul24 1): f4279-f4279. https: //doi. org/10. 1136/bmj. f4279
97. National institute for Health and Care Excellence NICE. Varicose veins in the legs: the diagnosis and management of varicose veins. NICE Clinical Guideline. 2013; 168.
98. Wittens C, Davies AH, Bæ kgaard N, Broholm R, Cavezzi A, Chastanet S, de Wolf M, Eggen C, Giannoukas A, Gohel M, Kakkos S, Lawson J, Nop- peney T, Onida S, Pittaluga P, Thomis S, Toonder I, Vuylsteke M, Commit- tee EG, Kolh P, de Borst GJ, Chakfé N, Debus S, Hinchliffe R, Koncar I, Lindholt J, de Ceniga MV, Vermassen F, Verzini F, Reviewers D, De Mae- seneer MG, Blomgren L, Hartung O, Kalodiki E, Korten E, Lugli M, Nay- lor R, Nicolini P, Rosales A. Editor’s choice — management of chronic venous disease. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2015; 49(6): 678-737. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. ejvs. 2015. 02. 007
99. Doganci S, Yildirim V, Demirkilic U. Does puncture site affect the rate of nerve injuries following endovenous laser ablation of the small saphenous veins? European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2011; 41(3): 400-405. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. ejvs. 2010. 11. 029
100. Mendes-Pinto D, Bastianetto P, Cavalcanti Braga Lyra L, Kikuchi R, Kab- nick L. Endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein comparing 1920 nm and 1470 nm diode laser. Int Angiol. 2016; 35(6): 599-604.
101. Vuylsteke M, De Bo T, Dompe G, Di Crisci D, Abbad C, Mordon S. En- dovenous laser treatment: is there a clinical difference between using a 1500 nm and a 980 nm diode laser? A multicenter randomised clinical trial. Int Angiol. 2011; 30(4): 327-334.
102. Proebstle T, Moehler T, Gü l D, Herdemann S. Endovenous treatment of the great saphenous vein using a 1320 nm Nd: YAG laser causes fewer side effects than using a 940 nm diode laser. Dermatologic Surgery. 2005; 31(12): 1678-1684. https: //doi. org/10. 2310/6350. 2005. 31308
103. Goldman M, Mauricio M, Rao J. Intravascular 1320 nm laser closure of the great saphenous vein. Dermatologic Surgery. 2004; 30(11): 1380-1385. https: //doi. org/10. 1097/00042728-200411000-00004
104. Pannier F, Rabe E, Maurins U. First results with a new 1470 nm diode laser for endovenous ablation of incompetent saphenous veins. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2009; 24(1): 26-30. https: //doi. org/10. 1258/phleb. 2008. 008038
105. Shaydakov E, Ilyukhin E, Rosukhovskiy D. Blood absorption during 970 and 1470 nm laser radiation in vitro. Int Angiol. 2015; 34(5): 475-482.
106. Pannier F, Rabe E, Rits J, Kadiss A, Maurins U. Endovenous laser ablation of great saphenous veins using a 1470 nm diode laser and the radial fibre — follow-up after six months. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2011; 26(1): 35-39. https: //doi. org/10. 1258/phleb. 2010. 009096
107. Prince E, Soares G, Silva M, Taner A, Ahn S, Dubel GJ, Jay BS. Impact of laser fiber design on outcome of endovenous ablation of lower-extremity varicose veins: results from a single practice. Cardiovasc intervent Radiol. 2010; 34(3): 536-541. https: //doi. org/10. 1007/s00270-010-9922-y
108. Schwarz T, von Hodenberg E, Furtwä ngler C, Rastan A, Zeller T, Neumann F. Endovenous laser ablation of varicose veins with the 1470 nm diode laser. J Vasc Surg. 2010; 51(6): 1474-1478. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. jvs. 2010. 01. 027
109. Doganci S, Demirkilic U. Comparison of 980 nm laser and bare-tip fibre with 1470 nm laser and radial fibre in the treatment of great saphenous vein varicosities: a prospective randomised clinical trial. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2010; 40(2): 254-259. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. ejvs. 2010. 04. 006
110. Hirokawa M, Ogawa T, Sugawara H, Shokoku S, Sato S. Comparison of 1470 nm laser and radial 2 ring fiber with 980 nm laser and bare-tip fiber in end- ovenous laser ablation of saphenous varicose veins: a multicenter, prospec- tive, randomized, non-blind study. Ann Vasc Dis. 2015; 8(4): 282-289. https: //doi. org/10. 3400/avd. oa. 15-00084
111. Hirokawa M, Kurihara N. Comparison of are-tip and radial fiber in end- ovenous laser ablation with 1470 nm diode laser. Ann Vasc Dis. 2014; 7(3): 239- 245. https: //doi. org/10. 3400/avd. oa. 14-00081
112. Vuylsteke M, Thomis S, Mahieu P, Mordon S, Fourneau I. Endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein using a bare fibre versus a tulip fibre: a randomised clinical trial. European Journal of Vascular and Endovas- cular Surgery. 2012; 44(6): 587-592. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. ejvs. 2012. 09. 003
113. Cowpland C, Cleese A, Whiteley M. Factors affecting optimal linear end- ovenous energy density for endovenous laser ablation in incompetent lower
limb truncal veins — a review of the clinical evidence. Phlebology: The Jour- nal of Venous Disease. 2016; 32(5): 299-306. https: //doi. org/10. 1177/0268355516648067
114. Proebstle T, Krummenauer F, Gü l D, Knop J. Nonocclusion and early reo- pening of the great saphenous vein after endovenous laser treatment is fluence dependent. Dermatologic Surgery. 2004; 30(2): 174-178. https: //doi. org/10. 1097/00042728-200402000-00013
115. Соколов А. Л., Лядов К. В., Луценко М. М. Лазерная облитерация вен для практических врачей. М.: ИД Медпрактика-М; 2011; 136. [Soko- lov AL, Lyadov KV, Lutsenko MM. Lazernaya obliteratsiya ven dlya prak- ticheskikh vrachei. Moskva: ID Medpraktika-M; 2011; 136. (In Russ. )].
116. Шайдаков Е. В., Илюхин Е. А., Григорян А. Г., Булатов В. Л., Росухов- ский Д. А., Шонов О. А. Карбонизация при эндовазальной лазерной облитерации радиальным световодом с длиной волны 1470 и 970 нм. Ангиология и сосудистая хирургия. 2015; 21(3): 107-110. [Shaydakov EV, Ilyukhin EA, Grigoryan AG, Bulatov VL, Rosukhovskiy DA, Shonov OA. Carbonization in endovasal laser obliteration by radial light guide with wave- length of 1470 and 970 nm. Angiol Sosud Khir. 2015; 21(3): 107-110. (In Russ. )].
117. Maurins U. Practical aspects of endjvenous laser ablation of varicose veins. Dr. Maurins Vein Clinic. Laima Print; 2014; 64.
118. Maurins U., Rabe E., Pannier F. Does laser power influence the results of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of incompetent saphenous veins with the 1 470nm diode laser? A prospective randomized study comparing 15 and 25 W. Int Angiol. 2009; 28(1): 32-37.
119. Bisang U, Meier T, Enzler M, Thalhammer C, Husmann M, Amann-Vesti B. Results of endovenous ClosureFast treatment for varicose veins in an outpa- tient setting. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2012; 27(3): 118-123. https: //doi. org/10. 1258/phleb. 2010. 010089
120. Proebstle T, Alm J, Gö ckeritz O, Wenzel C, Noppeney T, Lebard C, Pichot O, Sessa C, Creton D, Gockeritz 0. Three-year European follow-up of en- dovenous radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein with or without treatment of calf varicosities. J Vasc Surg. 2011; 54(1): 146-152. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. jvs. 2010. 12. 051
121. Proebstle T, Alm B, Gö ckeritz O, Wenzel C, Noppeney T, Lebard C, Ses- sa C, Creton D, Pichot O. Five-year results from the prospective European multicentre cohort study on radiofrequency segmental thermal ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins. British Journal of Surgery. 2015; 102(3): 212-218. https: //doi. org/10. 1002/bjs. 9679
122. Tamura K, Maruyama T. Mid-term report on the safety and effectiveness of endovenous radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins. Ann Vasc Dis. 2017; Dec 25: 10(4): 398-401. https: //doi. org/10. 3400/avd. oa. 17-00053
123. Joh J, Kim W, Jung I, Park K, Lee T, Kang J. Consensus for the treatment of varicose vein with radiofrequency ablation. Vasc Specialist Int. 2014; 30(4): 105-112. https: //doi. org/10. 5758/vsi. 2014. 30. 4. 105
124. Стойко Ю. М., Игнатьева Н. Я., Захаркина О. Л., Гулиева В. Е., Мазайш- вили К. В., Цыплящук А. В., Яшкин М. Н., Акимов С. С., Баграташви- ли В. Н., Харитонова С. Е. Экспериментальное обоснование режимов радиочастотной термооблитерации. Флебология. 2015; 9(2): 12-17. [Stoy- ko YuM, Ignatyeva NYa, Zakharkina OL, Gulieva VE, Mazayshvili KV, Tsyplyashchuk AV, Yashkin MN, Akimov SS, Bagratashvili VN, Khari- yonova SE. The experimental substantination of radiofrequency vein ablation regimes. Phlebologia. 2015; 9(2): 12-17. (In Russ. ].
125. Schuller-Petrović S, Pavlović M, Schuller-Lukić B, Schuller S. Retrospective analysis of routine use of a double heat cycle (DHC) during radiofrequency segmental ablation (ClosureFAST) of saphenous veins. Journal of the Euro- pean Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2015; 30(6): 1009-1012. https: //doi. org/10. 1111/jdv. 13178
126. Shaidakov E, Grigoryan A, Korzhevskii D, Ilyukhin EA, Rosukhovski DA, Bulatov VL, Tsarev OI. Morphologic changes in the vein after different numbers of radiofrequency ablation cycles. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Ve- nous and Lymphatic Disorders. 2015; 3(4): 358-363. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. jvsv. 2014. 09. 006
127. Шайдаков Е., Григорян А., Коржевский Д., Илюхин Е., Росуховский Д., Булатов В. Оценка морфологических изменений венозной стенки после радиочастотной облитерации in vivo. Вестник национального медико-хирургического центра им. Н. И. Пирогова. 2015; 10(3): 18-23 [Shai- dakov E, Grigoryan A, Korzhevskii D, Ilyukhin E, Rosukhovski D, Bula- tov V. Morphologic changes of the venous wall after radiofrequency oblit- eration in vivo. Vestnik natsional’nogo mediko-khirurgicheskogo tsentra im. N. I. Pirogova. 2015; 10(3): 18-23. (In Russ. )].
128. Calcagno D, Rossi J, Chi Ha. Effect of saphenous vein diameter on closure rate with ClosureFAST radiofrequency catheter. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2009; 43(6): 567-570. https: //doi. org/10. 1177/1538574409345026
129. Creton D, Pichot O, Sessa C, Proebstle T. Radiofrequency-powered seg- mental thermal obliteration carried out with the ClosureFast procedure: results at 1 year. Ann Vasc Surg. 2010; 24(3): 360-366. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. avsg. 2009. 09. 019
130. Garcí a-Madrid C, Pastor Manrique J, Sá nchez V, Sala-Planell E. End- ovenous radiofrequency ablation (venefit procedure): impact of different energy rates on great saphenous vein shrinkage. Ann Vasc Surg. 2013; 27(3): 314-321. https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. avsg. 2012. 06. 015
131. Шайдаков Е. В., Григорян А. Г., Илюхин Е. А., Булатов В. Л., Гальчен- ко М. И. Анализ эффективности радиочастотной облитерации с учетом диаметра целевой вены: многоцентровое ретроспективное продольное когортное исследование. Ангиология и сосудистая хирургия. 2014; 20(1): 87-94. [Shaidakov EV, Grigoryan AG, Ilyukhin EA, Bulatov VL, Galchen- ko MI. Analysis of efficacy of radiofrequency obliteration with due regard for the target vein’s diameter. Angiol Sosud Khir. 2014; 20(1): 87-94. (In Russ. )].
|
|
|
