 |
kМ = Фе = 1,15 × 10 -19 V × s = 3,14 × 10 -7 s2/ m2.
|
|
|
|
kМ = Фе = 1, 15 × 10 -19 V × s = 3, 14 × 10 -7 s2/ m2.
p–e 3, 55 × 10 -13 C × m/s
The coefficient kМ = mо/4 is the constant magnetic coefficient for vacuum. This coefficient was introduced so that all coefficients (gravitational, electric and magnetic) have the form of simple factors, and not formulas. These factors should directly reflect the ratio of the magnitude of the field to the magnitude of its direct source. Everything should be unambiguous here.
kМ = 12, 57× 10 -7 = 3, 14 × 10 -7 Hn /m.
4
Dimension [Hn /m] corresponds to the dimension [s2/m2].
If a Hn = Wb = V × s = V × s 2 = s 2 , then Hn/m= s 2 .
a C /s V × m m m 2
It is clear here that the magnetic coefficient has a simpler dimension
kМ = 3, 14 × 10 -7 s 2/ m 2.
But why such a dimension? If the ratio of the physical magnitude of the electric field to the physical magnitude of its source gives a dimensionless number, then the ratio of the physical magnitude of the magnetic field to the physical magnitude of its source gives some physical magnitude proportional to the square of the speed of light. If, for example, a charge and its electric field are one and the same entity, but simultaneously living in different spaces, then the coefficient of their ratio has no dimension. The first is equal to the second in every respect. A similar picture is observed in relation to the gravitational field of the particle and its mass. The first and the second have the same dimensions and " inhabit" one cell in Table 1. And here the " distance" between the magnetic field and its source for some reason is the value kМ = 3, 14 × 10 -7 s 2/m 2. Why?
The relationship between the electrical and magnetic constants has one important feature. eо mо = 1/с 2. With regard to the electrical and magnetic coefficients, this feature remains.
kЭ = 1, 13 × 10 11 V × m /C = 35, 98 × 10 16 m 2 = 4 с 2.
kМ 3, 14 × 10 -7 Hn /m s 2
Отношение электрического коэффициента к магнитному коэффициенту является электромагнитным отношением.
The ratio of the electric momentum of the considered electron to its charge is equal to the linear velocity of the electron in its orbit (v = 2, 2 × 10 6 m/s). Whereas the ratio of the magnetic and electric fields of the investigated electron momentum does not coincide at all with the value of this velocity.
|
|
|
Фе = 1, 15 × 10 -19 V × s = 6, 28 × 10 -12 s/m.
Nе 1, 83 × 10 -8 V × m
In such an incomprehensible way, the speed of an electron charge " looks" in hyperspace. And the only " justification" for the latter is that the fields are inhabitants of hyperspace, and in ordinary space we observe only their actions on our own material or bodily foundations. And this is a big difference.
This means that the speed of a body in ordinary space has a dimension of (m / s), and in hyperspace, where there are no distances, and everything that happens there, we see only through the " prism of the relationship between the metrics of both spaces", we see its equivalent in such an unusual form (c / m).
" Through the Looking Glass" and more!
However, if the last value is multiplied by the square of the speed of light, then everything " falls into place. "
We can say that the charge in hyperspace has the form of a " dandelion ", more precisely, the form of a sphere of full intensity flow of an indefinite (any) radius. But the impulse of this charge there already has the form of a rotating " dandelion", more precisely, the form of a rotating sphere of a full stream of tension, and such a sphere has its own energy, frequency and direction of rotation. And here we turn to the field of phenomena described by de Broglie (de Broglie waves).
The full flux of magnetic induction of a charge moving in a circle is its full magnetic field, since all magnetic lines here pass through the area bounded by the orbit of this charge.
P. К 59
In ordinary space, there is an electrical impulse of a moving charge, but the same impulse simultaneously exists in hyperspace, where it already has the form of an electromagnetic field. (К 2. 3) К 59
Since kM reflects only the magnetic component of this field, then, accordingly, we have to consider only this component, although the magnetic field does not exist separately from the electric field that generated it.
You can calculate the magnitude of the energy of the magnetic field of the electron under investigation.
Wм = Фе× i = 1, 15 × 10 -19 V s × 1, 1 × 10 -3 C/s = 6, 3× 10 -23 J = 3, 9 × 10 -4 e V.
2 2
Whereas Ке = m e v2 = 2, 1 × 10 -18 J =13. 2 e V.
|
|
|
2
However, as the electron's speed increases, its magnetic energy will increase in proportion to the square of the speed, while its electrical energy will always remain the same. In general, all our assumptions turned out to be correct.
The only thing that we did not suspect was about a simple mechanism for the conversion of the energy of the magnetic field of an atomic electron into the energy of its electric field and vice versa.
P. K 60. The principle of the electric and magnetic components of the electromagnetic field
The electromagnetic field of any moving charge is a rotating sphere (of an indefinite radius) of its electric field. The axis of its rotation coincides with the direction of the electric pulse of the charge. Its rotation frequency is proportional to the magnitude of this impulse. Each vector of the magnetic component of this field is located tangentially to its source (there are no distances there), and each vector of its electrical component is directed towards this source. (K 2. 3. ) K 60
The term " electromagnetic field" very accurately reflects the state of affairs, since the magnetic field is quite the " rotational component" of its electric field.
|
|
|
